Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lahteenmaki, A.
Right arrow Articles by Hovatta, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lahteenmaki, A.
Right arrow Articles by Hovatta, O.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 142-147, 1995
© 1995 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Intra-uterine insemination versus cyclic, low-dose prednisolone in couples with male antisperm antibodies

A. Lahteenmaki1,2, J. Veilahti3 and O. Hovatta1

1 Infertility Clinic, The Family Federation of Finland Kalevankatu 16 B, 00100 Helsinki 3 Department of Biomedicine, University of Helsinki Siltavuorenpenger 20 J, 00170 Helsinki, Finland

Correspondence: 2To whom correspondence should be addressed

A total of 46 couples with male immunological infertility entered the trial at the infertility clinic of the Family Federation of Finland. The men all showed a positive mixed antiglobulin reaction to immunoglobulin G in their semen; 31 men were also tested for sperm-bound IgA immunoglobulins by flow cytometry. Serum antisperm antibodies were checked in a tray agglutination test. The women showed normal reproductive endocrinology and at least one patent Fallopian tube. The couples were randomized to undergo either up to three intra-uterine inseminations (IUI), or timed intercourse with cyclic, low-dose (20 mg) prednisolone therapy of the men. Cross-over was carried out if no pregnancy occurred in the first stage. Timing of ovulation was based on urinary luteinizing hormone assay and transvaginal ultrasonographic measurements. In all, 40 couples either completed the study or the female partner conceived. IUI was significantly better (P = 0.04) with nine pregnancies than timed intercourse with prednisolone (one pregnancy). There were no significant associations between antibody levels, sperm count or motility versus the incidence of pregnancy. In male immunological infertility, well-timed IUI is an effective treatment method: results are obtained rapidly and steroidal side-effects can be avoided.

Key words: antisperm antibodies/intra-uterine insemination/prednisolone

Submitted on May 26, 1994; accepted on September 14, 1994.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
P. A. Skau and I. Folstad
Does immunity regulate ejaculate quality and fertility in humans?
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2005; 16(2): 410 - 416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
J. A. Stewart
Stimulated intra-uterine insemination is not a natural choice for the treatment of unexplained subfertility: Should the guidelines be changed?
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2003; 18(5): 903 - 907.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.