Human Reproduction, Vol. 10, No. 11, pp. 2824-2828, 1995
© 1995 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
research-article |
Treatment of severe male immunological infertility by intracytoplasmic sperm injection
Infertility Clinic, The Family Federation of Finland PO Box 849, 00101 Helsinki, Finland
Correspondence: 1To whom correspondence should be addressed
A total of 29 infertile couples (group A) with male antisperm antibodies detected by the mixed antiglobulin reaction (MAR) and partly by flow cytometry (n = 21) were treated using an intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) technique to assist fertilization. In all, 22 of them had shown a poor fertilization rate (6%) in previous in-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatments. The fertilization and cleavage rates in ICSI, 79 and 89% respectively, were similar to those in a MAR-negative group (group B; n = 20) injected because of male infertility (68 and 93% respectively). A third group (group C; n = 37) with male immune infertility was treated by conventional IVF. All these couples had at least one oocyte fertilized, but the overall fertilization rate (44%) in group C was significantly poorer (P < 0.001) than that in the two ICSI groups. However, the embryo quality was lower in group A compared with that in the other groups. A total of 13 pregnancies resulted in group A (46%), of which five ended in miscarriage. None of the six pregnancies (30%) in group B aborted during the first trimester. These results reveal, for the first time, that ICSI offers a good chance of fertilization for couples with male immunological infertility. However, post-fertilization events may compromise these results because of factors not yet clearly understood.
Key words: antisperm antibodies/in-vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic/sperm injection
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Nikolettos, B. Asimakopoulos, and I. S. Papastefanou Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection-An Assisted Reproduction Technique That Should Make Us Cautious About Imprinting Deregulation Reproductive Sciences, July 1, 2006; 13(5): 317 - 328. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Devroey and A. Van Steirteghem A review of ten years experience of ICSI Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2004; 10(1): 19 - 28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Westlander, E. Ekerhovd, S. Granberg, N. Lycke, L. Nilsson, C. Werner, and C. Bergh Serial ultrasonography, hormonal profile and antisperm antibody response after testicular sperm aspiration Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2001; 16(12): 2621 - 2627. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Ghazeeri and W. H. Kutteh Immunological testing and treatment in reproduction: frequency assessment of practice patterns at assisted reproduction clinics in the USA and Australia Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2001; 16(10): 2130 - 2135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Bohring, E. Krause, B. Habermann, and W. Krause Isolation and identification of sperm membrane antigens recognized by antisperm antibodies, and their possible role in immunological infertility disease Mol. Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2001; 7(2): 113 - 118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. H. Kutteh Antisperm antibodies: Do antisperm antibodies bound to spermatozoa alter normal reproductive function? Hum. Reprod., October 1, 1999; 14(10): 2426 - 2429. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Bronson Detection of antisperm antibodies: an argument against therapeutic nihilism Hum. Reprod., July 1, 1999; 14(7): 1671 - 1673. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



