Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ron-El, R.
Right arrow Articles by Van Steirteghem, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ron-El, R.
Right arrow Articles by Van Steirteghem, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 10, No. 11, pp. 2831-2834, 1995
© 1995 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology


research-article

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the mouse*

R. Ron-El1,3, J. Liu2, Z. Nagy2, H. Joris2, E. Van den Abbeel2 and A. Van Steirteghem2

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv, Israel 2Center for Reproductive Medicine, Brussels Free University Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium

Correspondence: 3To whom correspondence should be addressed

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) into mouse oocytes involves a very low survival rate. This study was designed to determine why ICSI frequently fails in mice. Metaphase II oocytes were obtained from superovulated 4–6 week old F1 hybrid mice. Spermatozoa were retrieved from the epididymis of 12–14 week old F1 hybrid mice. The spiked microinjection pipette used to inject a spermatozoon into the ooplasm had outer and inner diameters of 10 and 8 µm respectively. The oocytes used in the first part of the study were not activated (group 1). Some oocytes were incubated with calcium ionophore for 5 min (group 2). The injected oocytes were evaluated 6, 20, 48 and 72 h after injection. A total of 143 eggs in each group underwent ICSI. In group 1, sperm heads escaped into the perivitelline space. In all, 63 (47%) of the remaining oocytes were damaged during the injection or had degenerated by the first evaluation. The survival rate was 53%, but fertilization did not occur. In group 2, 31 oocytes (22%) were damaged during microinjection or soon degenerated. Two oocytes underwent accidental subzonal insemination. Six oocytes were fertilized (4.2%) among the 78% of survivors. After injection, the sperm tail was found in the cytoplasm (27 and 31% in groups 1 and 2 respectively), the perivitelline space (45% in both groups) or protruding through the zona pellucida (28 and 23% respectively). More oocytes degenerated when the tail remained in the cytoplasm, i.e. 78% in group 1 and 36% in group 2.

Key words: assisted fertilization/intracytoplasmic injection/microinsemination

*The study was performed during sabbatical leave of the first author at the Center for Reproductive Medicine, Brussels Free University, Belgium.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. Goossens, V. Frederickx, G. De Block, A. Van Steirteghem, and H. Tournaye
Blastocyst development after assisted reproduction using spermatozoa obtained after testicular stem cell transplantation in mice
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2006; 21(7): 1759 - 1764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
L. Hewitson
Primate models for assisted reproductive technologies
Reproduction, September 1, 2004; 128(3): 293 - 299.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K. Mizuno, K. Hoshi, and T. Huang
Fertilization and embryo development in a mouse ICSI model using human and mouse sperm after immobilization in polyvinylpyrrolidone
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2002; 17(9): 2350 - 2355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.