Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (25)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lockwood, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Barlow, D. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lockwood, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Barlow, D. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 293-298, 1995
© 1995 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology


research-article

Endocrinology: A prospective randomized single-blind comparative trial of nafarelin acetate with buserelin in long-protocol gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue controlled in-vitro fertilization cycles

Gillian M. Lockwood, Stuart M. Pinkerton and David H. Barlow

Nuffield Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, John Radcliffe Hospital Oxford OX3 9DU, UK

The use of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists to control ovulation induction cycles for in-vitro fertilization (IVF) has been shown to increase the pregnancy rate and live birth rate compared with non-analogue cycles. Different formulations of GnRH agonist are available with different routes and frequencies of administration. In this prospective study, the efficacy and safety of intranasal nafarelin and buserelin as adjunctive therapy during IVF were assessed. A total of 240 female patients were recruited to the study and in the first phase patients were randomized to receive either intranasal nafarelin 200 µg twice daily or buserelin 200 µg five times daily. In the second phase, patients received either nafarelin 400 µg twice daily or buserelin 200 µg five times daily. Nafarelin 400 µg and buserelin 200 µg both produced clinical pregnancy rates of 31% per recruit and 39% per embryo transfer. The rates for nafarelin 200 ug were 23 and 37% respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in pregnancy rates, by either drug or dosage. The time taken for pituitary down-regulation to be achieved was significantly longer on nafarelin 200 µg than on either nafarelin 400 µg or buserelin. The total number of days stimulation with human menopausal gonadotrophin required to reach criteria for human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration was significantly longer on buserelin than on either dose of nafarelin. Median serum oestradiol concentrations on the day of HCG administration were significantly higher on either dose of nafarelin than on buserelin.

Key words: buserelin acetate/GnRH analogues/in-vitro fertilization/nafarelin acetate/ovulation induction


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
R. Fleming
Progesterone elevation on the day of hCG: methodological issues
Hum. Reprod. Update, June 2, 2008; (2008) dmn019v1.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Bjercke, P. Fedorcsak, T. Abyholm, R. Storeng, G. Ertzeid, N. Oldereid, A. Omland, and T. Tanbo
IVF/ICSI outcome and serum LH concentration on day 1 of ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH under pituitary suppression
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2005; 20(9): 2441 - 2447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Almagor and Y. Hovav
The development of an oocyte-containing follicle during gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist administration
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2001; 16(8): 1698 - 1699.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Dor, D. Bider, A. Shulman, J. Levron, S. Shine, S. Mashiach, and J. Rabinovici
Effects of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists on human ovarian steroid secretion in vivo and in vitro--results of a prospective, randomized in-vitro fertilization study
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2000; 15(6): 1225 - 1230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Al-Azemi, A. L. Bernal, J. Steele, I. Gramsbergen, D. Barlow, and S. Kennedy
Ovarian response to repeated controlled stimulation in in-vitro fertilization cycles in patients with ovarian endometriosis
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2000; 15(1): 72 - 75.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. Lashen, W. Ledger, A. Lopez-Bernal, and D. Barlow
Poor responders to ovulation induction: is proceeding to in-vitro fertilization worthwhile?
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 1999; 14(4): 964 - 969.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. Lashen, W. Ledger, A. L. Bernal, and D. Barlow
Extremes of body mass do not adversely affect the outcome of superovulation and in-vitro fertilization
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 1999; 14(3): 712 - 715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. Dada, O. Salha, H.S. Baillie, and V. Sharma
A comparison of three gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues in an in-vitro fertilization programme: a prospective randomized study
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 1999; 14(2): 288 - 293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
F. Dancoine, G. Couplet, J. Buvat, C. Guittard, G. Marcolin, and J.-C. Fourlinnie
Analytical and clinical evaluation of the Immulite(R) estradiol assay in serum from patients undergoing in vitro fertilization: estradiol increase in mature follicles
Clin. Chem., July 1, 1997; 43(7): 1165 - 1171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.