Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Agarwal, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Buyalos, R. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Agarwal, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Buyalos, R. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 328-331, 1995
© 1995 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology


research-article

Infertility: Corpus luteum function and pregnancy rates with clomiphene citrate therapy: comparison of human chorionic gonadotrophin-induced versus spontaneous ovulation*

Sanjay K. Agarwal and Richard P. Buyalos1

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UCLA School of Medicine 10833 Le Conte, Room 22-177 CHS, Los Angeles, CA 90024-1740, USA

Correspondence: 1To whom correspondence should be addressed

A total of 508 clomiphene citrate cycles with intra-uterine insemination (IUI) performed in 233 consecutive patients were studied. In 247 cycles insemination was performed 36–38 h after human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG)-triggered ovulation; in the remaining 261 cycles IUI was performed 18–20 h after urinary luteinizing hormone (LH) kit detection of a spontaneous LH surge. Corpus luteum function, as determined by luteal phase length and midluteal progesterone concentrations, together with pregnancy rates were analysed. There was no difference in luteal phase parameters between spontaneous and HCG-triggered cycles when adjusting for patient age. Furthermore, the pregnancy rates did not differ between the HCG and LH kit groups, even after adjusting for patient age and number of motile spermatozoa inseminated. Additionally, the large numbers of cycles analysed provided sufficient power to detect increases in clinical pregnancy rates in spontaneous ovulatory cycles and HCG-induced ovulation of 10.1 and 2.4% respectively, using the customary significance level (alpha-type error) of 0.05. These findings indicate that pregnancy rates and corpus luteum function in carefully monitored clomiphene citrate/IUI cycles do not differ between HCG-triggered and spontaneous ovulatory cycles.

Key words: clomiphene citrate/corpus luteum function/HCG/IUI/LH kit

*Presented, in part, at the 41st annual meeting of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation, Chicago, IL, USA, March 22-26, 1994


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
I. E. Messinis
Ovulation induction: a mini review
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2005; 20(10): 2688 - 2697.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R. Homburg
Clomiphene citrate--end of an era? a mini-review
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2005; 20(8): 2043 - 2051.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.