Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (33)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Selick, C.E.
Right arrow Articles by Navot, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Selick, C.E.
Right arrow Articles by Navot, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 392-395, 1995
© 1995 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology


research-article

Fertilization and early embryology: Embryo quality and pregnancy potential of fresh compared with frozen embryos—is freezing detrimental to high quality embryos?*

C.E. Selick, G.E. Hofmann1, C. Albano2, G.M. Horowitz3, A.B. Copperman, G.J. Garrisi and D. Navot4

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mount Sinai Medical Center New York, NY 10029, USA

Correspondence: 1To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bethesda Center for Reproductive Health and Fertility, 619 Oak Street, Cincinnati, OH 45206, USA

To determine the effect of cryopreservation on embryo quality and the pregnancy potential of embryos, donated oocytes from the same donor (n = 24) were randomly allocated, with subsequent transfer to two or more different ovum recipients resulting in at least one fresh and one frozen embryo transfer cycle from the same cohort of oocytes. Endometrial receptivity was controlled in all ovum recipients, and male factor patients were excluded. The number of embryos transferred, mean embryo grade transferred, number of high quality embryos (grade ≤2.5, grade 1 being best) transferred and embryo implantation and live birth rates are reported. Significantly more embryos (4.4 ± 1.2 versus 3.3 ± 1.2, P < 0.00003) of higher quality (1.9 ± 0.5 versus 2.1 ± 0.5, P < 0.013) and of a more advanced cell stage (3.0 ± 0.6 versus 2.6 ± 0.7, P < 0.019) were transferred fresh than after cryopreservation respectively. Implantation rates/embryo [19/151 (12.6%) and 9/111 (8.1%)] and live birth rates/transfer [11/42 (26.2%) and 6/45 (13.3%)], from fresh and frozen transfers respectively, were not significantly different despite the larger number of high quality embryos transferred fresh. Embryo cryopreservation adversely affects embryo quality, but does not have detrimental effects on the implantation or pregnancy potential of high quality embryos. Because of the loss of embryos during freeze — thawing during frozen embryo cycles, every effort should be made to attempt a fresh transfer.

Key words: cryopreservation/embryo quality/implantation/invitro fertilization/oocyte donation

2Present address: Instituto Materna-Infantile, Palermo, Italy

3Present address: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (SGHO), Travis AFB, CA 94535, USA

4Present address: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York Medical College, Munger Pavillion, Room 306, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA

*Presented in part at the 41st Annual Meeting of The Society For Gynecologic Investigations, Chicago, Illinois, USA, March 22–25, 1994.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Bechoua, K. Astruc, S. Thouvenot, S. Girod, A. Chiron, C. Jimenez, and P. Sagot
How to demonstrate that eSET does not compromise the likelihood of having a baby?
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2009; 24(12): 3073 - 3081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
M. Sonmezer and K. Oktay
Fertility preservation in female patients
Hum. Reprod. Update, May 1, 2004; 10(3): 251 - 266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Revel, A. Safran, N. Laufer, A. Lewin, B.E. Reubinov, and A. Simon
Twin delivery following 12 years of human embryo cryopreservation: Case report
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2004; 19(2): 328 - 329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
M. Tachataki, R. M.L. Winston, and D. M. Taylor
Quantitative RT-PCR reveals tuberous sclerosis gene, TSC2, mRNA degradation following cryopreservation in the human preimplantation embryo
Mol. Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2003; 9(10): 593 - 601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. El-Toukhy, Y. Khalaf, K. Al-Darazi, F. O'Mahony, E. Wharf, A. Taylor, and P. Braude
Cryo-thawed embryos obtained from conception cycles have double the implantation and pregnancy potential of those from unsuccessful cycles
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2003; 18(6): 1313 - 1318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J.X. Wang, Y.Y. Yap, and C.D. Matthews
Frozen-thawed embryo transfer: influence of clinical factors on implantation rate and risk of multiple conception
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2001; 16(11): 2316 - 2319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. Balakier, O. Cabaca, D. Bouman, A. B. Shewchuk, C. Laskin, and J. A. Squire
Spontaneous blastomere fusion after freezing and thawing of early human embryos leads to polyploidy and chromosomal mosaicism
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2000; 15(11): 2404 - 2410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D.H. Edgar, H. Bourne, A.L. Speirs, and J.C. McBain
A quantitative analysis of the impact of cryopreservation on the implantation potential of human early cleavage stage embryos
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2000; 15(1): 175 - 179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. Uechi, O. Tsutsumi,3, Y. Morita, Y. Takai, and Y. Taketani
Comparison of the effects of controlled-rate cryopreservation and vitrification on 2-cell mouse embryos and their subsequent development
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 1999; 14(11): 2827 - 2832.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.