Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (106)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vandromme, J.
Right arrow Articles by Leroy, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vandromme, J.
Right arrow Articles by Leroy, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 576-579, 1995
© 1995 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology


research-article

Infertility: Hydrosalpinges in in-vitro fertilization: an unfavourable prognostic feature

Jean Vandromme1, Emanuel Chasse, Bernard Lejeune, Michel Van Rysselberge, Annick Delvigne and Fernand Leroy

IVF Clinic, Free University Brussels Saint-Pierre Hospital 322, Rue Haute, 1000 Brussels, Belgium

Correspondence: 1To whom correspondence should be addressed

The aim of this study was to determine whether the presence of a hydrosalpinx influences in-vitro fertilization (IVF) prognosis. Comparisons were made between 69 IVF cycles in 37 patients carrying hydrosalpinges (hydrosalpinx group) and 67 IVF cycles in 41 patients without tubes or surgically sterilized (control group). Twenty-two patients carrying hydrosalpinges underwent salpingectomy or salpingoplasty (operated group); they then underwent 42 IVF trials which were compared with the two former groups. In the hydrosalpinx group, pregnancy rates by oocyte retrieval were 10.1% for clinical and ongoing pregnancies. In the control group, the corresponding pregnancy rates were 23.0 and 21.3% respectively. The implantation rate per embryo was 4.2% for clinical and ongoing pregnancies in the hydrosalpinx group and 11.0 and 10.4% respectively in the control group. The operated group had pregnancy rates of 38.1% for clinical pregnancies and 31.0% for ongoing pregnancies, with implantation rates of 17.4 (clinical) and 14.8% (ongoing) respectively. Pregnancy and implantation rates were statistically lower in the hydrosalpinx group as compared with controls and with the operated group. The differences between control and operated groups were not significant. In conclusion, the presence of a hydrosalpinx is thus associated with poor prognosis in IVF treatment. Surgical correction of such lesions appears to restore high success rates.

Key words: hydrosalpinx/IVF/pregnancy and implantation rates/surgical correction


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
N. Hammadieh, A. Coomarasamy, B. Ola, S. Papaioannou, M. Afnan, and K. Sharif
Ultrasound-guided hydrosalpinx aspiration during oocyte collection improves pregnancy outcome in IVF: a randomized controlled trial
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2008; 23(5): 1113 - 1117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Obstetrician and GynaecologistHome page
D. Siassakos, A. Syed, and P. Wardle
Tubal disease and assisted reproduction
Obstet Gynaecol (Lond), April 1, 2008; 10(2): 80 - 87.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
N. Hammadieh, M. Afnan, J. Evans, K. Sharif, N. Amso, and O. Olufowobi
A postal survey of hydrosalpinx management prior to IVF in the United Kingdom
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2004; 19(4): 1009 - 1012.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. W. Sagoskin, B. A. Lessey, G. L. Mottla, K. S. Richter, R. J. Chetkowski, A. S. Chang, M. J. Levy, and R. J. Stillman
Salpingectomy or proximal tubal occlusion of unilateral hydrosalpinx increases the potential for spontaneous pregnancy
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2003; 18(12): 2634 - 2637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L.Y. Chan, P.Y. Chiu, L.P. Cheung, C.J. Haines, H.F. Tung, and T.K. Lau
A study of teratogenicity of hydrosalpinx fluid using a whole rat embryo culture model
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2003; 18(5): 955 - 958.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K. Thomas, A.J. Thomson, S.J. Wood, C.R. Kingsland, G. Vince, and D.I. Lewis-Jones
Endometrial integrin expression in women undergoing IVF and ICSI: a comparison of the two groups and fertile controls
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2003; 18(2): 364 - 369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M.A. Aboulghar, R.T. Mansour, and G.I. Serour
Spontaneous intrauterine pregnancy following salpingectomy for a unilateral hydrosalpinx: Case report
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2002; 17(4): 1099 - 1100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. A. Bedaiwy, J. M. Goldberg, T. Falcone, M. Singh, D. Nelson, H. Azab, X. Wang, and R. Sharma
Relationship between oxidative stress and embryotoxicity of hydrosalpingeal fluid
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2002; 17(3): 601 - 604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. J. Levi, J. H. Segars, B. T. Miller, and M. P. Leondires
Endometrial cavity fluid is associated with poor ovarian response and increased cancellation rates in ART cycles
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2001; 16(12): 2610 - 2615.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Strandell, A. Lindhard, U. Waldenstrom, and J. Thorburn
Hydrosalpinx and IVF outcome: cumulative results after salpingectomy in a randomized controlled trial
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2001; 16(11): 2403 - 2410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
I. Bildirici, O. Bukulmez, A. Ensari, H. Yarali, and T. Gurgan
A prospective evaluation of the effect of salpingectomy on endometrial receptivity in cases of women with communicating hydrosalpinges
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2001; 16(11): 2422 - 2426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. de Vantery Arrighi, H. Lucas, D. El-Mowafi, A. Campana, and D. Chardonnens
Effects of human hydrosalpinx fluid on in-vitro murine fertilization
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2001; 16(4): 676 - 682.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. H. Yu Ng, L. C. Ajonuma, E. Yee Lan Lau, W. Shu Biu Yeung, and P. Chung Ho
Adverse effects of hydrosalpinx fluid on sperm motility and survival
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2000; 15(4): 772 - 777.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Strandell, A. Lindhard, U. Waldenstrom, J. Thorburn, P.O. Janson, and L. Hamberger
Hydrosalpinx and IVF outcome: a prospective, randomized multicentre trial in Scandinavia on salpingectomy prior to IVF
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 1999; 14(11): 2762 - 2769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Lass
What is the preferred treatment for hydrosalpines? The ovary's perspective
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 1999; 14(7): 1674 - 1677.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. Camus, C. Poncelet, F. Goffinet, B. Wainer, F. Merlet, I. Nisand, and H.J. Philippe
Pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization in cases of tubal infertility with and without hydrosalpinx: a meta-analysis of published comparative studies
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 1999; 14(5): 1243 - 1249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. A. Cohen, S. R. Lindheim, and M. V. Sauer
Hydrosalpinges adversely affect implantation in donor oocyte cycles
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 1999; 14(4): 1087 - 1089.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Bloechle
What is a hydrosalpinx? A plea for the use of a proper terminology in scientific discussion
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 1999; 14(3): 578 - 578.
[Full Text]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S.D. Spandorfer, A. Neuer, D. LaVerda, G. Byrne, H-C. Liu, Z. Rosenwaks, and S.S. Witkin
Previously undetected Chlamydia trachomatis infection, immunity to heat shock proteins and tubal occlusion in women undergoing in-vitro fertilization
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 1999; 14(1): 60 - 64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. Ejdrup Bredkjær, S. Ziebe, B. Hamid, Y. Zhou, A. Loft, A. Lindhard, and A. Nyboe Andersen
Delivery rates after in-vitro fertilization following bilateral salpingectomy due to hydrosalpinges: a case control study
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 1999; 14(1): 101 - 105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.