Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (25)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liu, P.
Right arrow Articles by Rose, G.A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liu, P.
Right arrow Articles by Rose, G.A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 968-969, 1995
© 1995 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

research-article

Ethics and society: Social aspects of >800 couples coming forward for gender selection of their children

Peter Liu1 and G.Alan Rose

London Gender Clinic 140 Park Road, Hendon, London NW4 3TL, UK

Correspondence: 1To whom correspondence should be addressed

The social characteristics of 809 couples attending a sex preselection clinic have been studied. Their ethnic origins were: Indian 57.8%, European 32.0%, Chinese 3.6% and others 6.8%. The average number of boys and girls per family was 0.09 and 2.70 respectively for couples wanting a boy, and 2.46 and 0.14 for those wanting a girl. The average age of the wives was 34.0 years. These figures were not significantly different in any ethnic subgroup. Out of all the couples, 80.6% stated that they would have had another baby even had sex preselection not been on offer; 37.5% of the couples interviewed have been treated so far. The figures among those treated are substantially the same as those for the whole group. Asian and Middle Eastern couples overwhelmingly wanted boys, whereas European couples showed a slight preference for girls. These results suggest that, given certain guidelines, sex selection is unlikely to lead to a serious distortion of the sex ratio in Britain and other Western societies, but may need careful monitoring in other parts of the world.

Key words: gender selection/sex selection


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
N. Ahmad Al-Akour, M. Khassawneh, Y. Khader, and E. Dahl
Sex preference and interest in preconception sex selection: a survey among pregnant women in the north of Jordan
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2009; 24(7): 1665 - 1669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
A.L. Kalfoglou, J. Scott, and K. Hudson
Attitudes about preconception sex selection: a focus group study with Americans
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2008; 23(12): 2731 - 2736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Med. EthicsHome page
Z O Merhi and L Pal
Gender "tailored" conceptions: should the option of embryo gender selection be available to infertile couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology?
J. Med. Ethics, August 1, 2008; 34(8): 590 - 593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
E. Dahl, M. Beutel, B. Brosig, and K.-D. Hinsch
Preconception sex selection for non-medical reasons:a representative survey from Germany
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2003; 18(10): 2231 - 2234.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Med. EthicsHome page

Why sex selection should be
J. Med. Ethics, October 1, 2001; 27(5): 302 - 307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
J. Savulescu and E. Dahl
Sex selection and preimplantation diagnosis: A response to the Ethics Committee of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2000; 15(9): 1879 - 1880.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.