Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (40)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Albano, C.
Right arrow Articles by Devroey, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Albano, C.
Right arrow Articles by Devroey, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 11, No. 10, pp. 2114-2118, 1996
© 1996 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology


research-article

EndocrinologyHormonal profile during the follicular phase in cycles stimulated with a combination of human menopausal gonadotrophin and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist (Cetrorelix)

C. Albano1,4, J. Smitz1, M. Camus1, H. Riethmüller-Winzen2, M. Siebert-Weigel2, K. Diedrich3, A.C. Van Steirteghem1 and P. Devroey1

1Centre for Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital and Medical School, Dutch-speaking Brussels Free University Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium 2ASTA Medica AG Frankfurt Main, Germany 33Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Medical University of Lübeck Germany

Correspondence: 4To whom correspondence should be addressed

A third-generation gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist (Cetrorelix) was used during ovarian stimulation in 32 patients undergoing assisted reproduction, in order to prevent the premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surge. In all patients, ovarian stimulation was carried out with two or three ampoules of human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG), starting on day 2 of the menstrual cycle. In addition, 0.5 mg of Cetrorelix was administered daily from day 6 of HMG treatment until the day of ovulation induction by human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG). A significant drop in plasma LH concentration was observed within a few hours of the first administration of Cetrorelix (P<0.005). Moreover, no LH surge was detected at any point in the treatment period in any of the 32 patients. A mean oestradiol concentration of 2122±935 ng/1 was observed on the day of the HCG administration, indicating normal folliculogenesis. Like LH, progesterone concentration also dropped within a few hours of the first administration of Cetrorelix (P< 0.005). A 0.5 mg daily dose of Cetrorelix prevented a premature LH surge in all the 32 patients treated.

Key words: GnRH antagonist (Cetrorelix)/in-vitro fertilization/LH surge/ovarian stimulation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
H.M. Fatemi, B. Popovic-Todorovic, E. Papanikolaou, P. Donoso, and P. Devroey
An update of luteal phase support in stimulated IVF cycles
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2007; 13(6): 581 - 590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
N. Prapas, Y. Prapas, Y. Panagiotidis, S. Prapa, P. Vanderzwalmen, R. Schoysman, and G. Makedos
GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in oocyte donation cycles: a prospective randomized study
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2005; 20(6): 1516 - 1520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
E. M. Kolibianakis, C. Albano, M. Camus, H. Tournaye, A. C. Van Steirteghem, and P. Devroey
Initiation of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist on Day 1 as Compared to Day 6 of Stimulation: Effect on Hormonal Levels and Follicular Development in in Vitro Fertilization Cycles
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2003; 88(12): 5632 - 5637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. van Wely, N. Bayram, and F. van der Veen
Recombinant FSH in alternative doses or versus urinary gonadotrophins for ovulation induction in subfertility associated with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review based on a Cochrane review
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2003; 18(6): 1143 - 1149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K.J. Thong, P.Y. Yong, and Q. Menezes
The administration of the GnRH antagonist, cetrorelix, to ooctye donors simplifies oocyte donation
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2003; 18(6): 1256 - 1258.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Bonduelle, I. Liebaers, V. Deketelaere, M.-P. Derde, M. Camus, P. Devroey, and A. Van Steirteghem
Neonatal data on a cohort of 2889 infants born after ICSI (1991-1999) and of 2995 infants born after IVF (1983-1999)
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2002; 17(3): 671 - 694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. A. Garcia-Velasco, V. Isaza, C. Vidal, A. Landazabal, J. Remohi, C. Simon, and A. Pellicer
Human ovarian steroid secretion in vivo: effects of GnRH agonist versus antagonist (cetrorelix)
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2001; 16(12): 2533 - 2539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. Ragni, W. Vegetti, E. Baroni, M. Colombo, M. Arnoldi, G. Lombroso, and P. G. Crosignani
Comparison of luteal phase profile in gonadotrophin stimulated cycles with or without a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2001; 16(11): 2258 - 2262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Wikland, C. Bergh, K. Borg, T. Hillensjo, C.M. Howles, A. Knutsson, L. Nilsson, and M. Wood
A prospective, randomized comparison of two starting doses of recombinant FSH in combination with cetrorelix in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2001; 16(8): 1676 - 1681.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Tavaniotou, C. Albano, J. Smitz, and P. Devroey
Comparison of LH concentrations in the early and mid-luteal phase in IVF cycles after treatment with HMG alone or in association with the GnRH antagonist Cetrorelix
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2001; 16(4): 663 - 667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Albano, R.E. Felberbaum, J. Smitz, H. Riethmuller-Winzen, J. Engel, K. Diedrich, and P. Devroey
Ovarian stimulation with HMG: results of a prospective randomized phase III European study comparing the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH)-antagonist cetrorelix and the LHRH-agonist buserelin
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2000; 15(3): 526 - 531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. J. Out, D. D.M. Braat, B. M.E. Lintsen, T. Gurgan, O. Bukulmez, O. Gokmen, G. Keles, P. Caballero, J. M. Gonzalez, F. Fabregues, et al.
Increasing the daily dose of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (Puregon(R)) does not compensate for the age-related decline in retrievable oocytes after ovarian stimulation
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2000; 15(1): 29 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R. A. Anderson, D. Kinniburgh, and D. T. Baird
Preliminary experience of the use of a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist in ovulation induction/in-vitro fertilization prior to cancer treatment: Case Report
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 1999; 14(10): 2665 - 2668.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Kol, A. Lightman, T. Hillensjo, P. Devroey, B. Fauser, B. Tarlatzis, B. Mannaerts, and J. Itskovitz-Eldor
High doses of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist in in-vitro fertilization cycles do not adversely affect the outcome of subsequent freeze–thaw cycles
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 1999; 14(9): 2242 - 2244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.