Human Reproduction, Vol. 11, No. 11, pp. 2434-2437, 1996
© 1996 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
research-article |
Infertility: Enhancement of outcome from intracytoplasmic sperm injection: does co-culture or assisted hatching improve implantation rates?
Reproductive Biology Associates 5505 Peachtree Dunwoody Road, Suite 400, Atlanta, GA 30342, USA
Correspondence: 1To whom correspondence should be addressed
In two separate prospectively randomized trials, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles were studied in a controlled manner to monitor the effects of either bovine oviductal epithelial cell co-culture (n = 119) or assisted hatching by zona drilling (n = 100). In the first study, immediately following ICSI, all eggs were placed directly either onto partial monolayers of bovine oviductal cells or into regular culture medium. Although the embryo developmental rate was apparently compromised in part by the presence of the co-culture cells, ultimately there were no significant differences in either the viable pregnancy rate (31.6% co-culture versus 29.0% control) or the embryonic implantation rate (11.4% co-culture versus 13.6% control). Assisted hatching also had no significant impact on ICSI cycle outcome in terms of either the viable pregnancy rate (30.0% assisted hatching versus 32.0% control) or the embryonic implantation rate (8.5% assisted hatching versus 13.5% control). However, in female patients aged 2
35 years, assisted hatching appeared to convey a marginally significant benefit in terms of both the viable pregnancy rate (35.5% assisted hatching versus 11.1% control) and the embryonic implantation rate (103% assisted hatching versus 3.1 % control). It seems that the overall improvement of ICSI cycle outcome cannot be achieved by the general application of either co-culture or assisted hatching. Nevertheless, it is possible that there remain specific patient groups that might benefit from selected use of either of these modalities.
Key words: assisted hatching/co-culture/ICSI/pregnancy outcome
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Dias, R. McNamee, and A. Vail Evidence of improving quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in subfertility Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2006; 21(10): 2617 - 2627. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Frydman, S. Madoux, L. Hesters, C. Duvernoy, E. Feyereisen, A. Le Du, G. Tachdjian, R. Frydman, and R. Fanchin A randomized double-blind controlled study on the efficacy of laser zona pellucida thinning on live birth rates in cases of advanced female age Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2006; 21(8): 2131 - 2135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Edi-Osagie, L. Hooper, and M. W. Seif The impact of assisted hatching on live birth rates and outcomes of assisted conception: a systematic review Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2003; 18(9): 1828 - 1835. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Ebner, M. Moser, C. Yaman, M. Sommergruber, J. Hartl, K. Jesacher, and G. Tews Prospective hatching of embryos developed from oocytes exhibiting difficult oolemma penetration during ICSI Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2002; 17(5): 1317 - 1320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E.S. Sills, M. Moomjy, N. Zaninovic, L. L. Veeck, M. McGee, G. D. Palermo, and Z. Rosenwaks Human zona pellucida micromanipulation and monozygotic twinning frequency after IVF Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2000; 15(4): 890 - 895. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Simón, A. Mercader, J. Garcia-Velasco, G. Nikas, C. Moreno, J. Remohí, and A. Pellicer Coculture of Human Embryos with Autologous Human Endometrial Epithelial Cells in Patients with Implantation Failure J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 1999; 84(8): 2638 - 2646. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||

