Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (25)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Csemiczky, G.
Right arrow Articles by Wramsby, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Csemiczky, G.
Right arrow Articles by Wramsby, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 11, No. 11, pp. 2438-2440, 1996
© 1996 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology


research-article

Infertility: High tubal damage grade is associated with low pregnancy rate in women undergoing in-vitro fertilization treatment

György Csemiczky, Landgren Britt-Marie, Gabriel Fried and Hakan Wramsby1

Department of Woman and Child Health, Division for Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Karolinska Hospital PO Box 140, S-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden

Correspondence: 1To whom correspondence should be addressed

In order to analyse the relationship between grade of tubal damage and pregnancy rate following in-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment, 50 consecutive couples with isolated tubal infertility who underwent IVF without previous reconstructive surgery were studied. The couples had tried to conceive for 2.5–5.6 years (mean 3.9 years) and had gone through a complete investigation for infertility. All women fulfilled the standard criteria for normal ovulatory cycles. All males had normal spenniograms. Tubal function was in each case evaluated by hysterosalpingography and lapa-roscopy. Grade of tubal damage was classified on a scale of I–IV. Patients with milder tubal damage (groups I–II) showed considerably higher take-home baby rate per started cycle (48%) than patients with severe tubal damage (group IV; 6%) (P < 0.001) even though patients in group IV underwent more treatment cycles than patients in groups I–II (2.7 versus 1.8; P < 0.01). In the first treatment cycle nine out of 12 patients in groups I–II became pregnant as compared with only one out of 16 in group IV (P < 0.01). As indicators of lower ovarian response, the women in group IV needed a higher number of gonadotrophin ampoules per cycle (P < 0.001) and exhibited lower pre-ovum retrieval oestradiol concentrations (P < 0.001). Oocyte retrievals per started cycle (I–II: 100%; III: 98%; IV: 84%) did not differ significantly between the groups, neither did pre-embryo replacements (I–II: 95%; III: 80%; IV: 73%) nor pre-embryos per replacement (I–II: 3.0; III: 2.9; IV: 2.8). The present results concerning the role of tubal damage grade for the outcome of IVF treatment should be considered in patient counselling. Further studies are needed to elucidate the mechanisms by which the extent of tubal damage may impair ovarian function and reduce IVF outcome.

Key words: Fallopian tube/infertility/in-vitro fertilization/pregnancy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
N. Hammadieh, A. Coomarasamy, B. Ola, S. Papaioannou, M. Afnan, and K. Sharif
Ultrasound-guided hydrosalpinx aspiration during oocyte collection improves pregnancy outcome in IVF: a randomized controlled trial
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2008; 23(5): 1113 - 1117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
V. Martinet, Y. Manigart, S. Rozenberg, B. Becker, M. Gerard, and A. Delvigne
Ovarian response to stimulation of HIV-positive patients during IVF treatment: a matched, controlled study
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2006; 21(5): 1212 - 1217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Macmillan
Chlamydia trachomatis in subfertile women undergoing uterine instrumentation: The clinician's role
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2002; 17(6): 1433 - 1436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Strandell, A. Lindhard, U. Waldenstrom, and J. Thorburn
Prophylactic salpingectomy does not impair the ovarian response in IVF treatment
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2001; 16(6): 1135 - 1139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Strandell, C. Bergh, and K. Lundin
Selection of patients suitable for one-embryo transfer may reduce the rate of multiple births by half without impairment of overall birth rates
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2000; 15(12): 2520 - 2525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Kinnunen, P. Molander, A. Laurila, I. Rantala, R. Morrison, M. Lehtinen, R. Karttunen, A. Tiitinen, J. Paavonen, and H.-M. Surcel
Chlamydia trachomatis reactive T lymphocytes from upper genital tract tissue specimens
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2000; 15(7): 1484 - 1489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Strandell, A. Lindhard, U. Waldenstrom, J. Thorburn, P.O. Janson, and L. Hamberger
Hydrosalpinx and IVF outcome: a prospective, randomized multicentre trial in Scandinavia on salpingectomy prior to IVF
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 1999; 14(11): 2762 - 2769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Lass
What is the preferred treatment for hydrosalpines? The ovary's perspective
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 1999; 14(7): 1674 - 1677.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. Ejdrup Bredkjær, S. Ziebe, B. Hamid, Y. Zhou, A. Loft, A. Lindhard, and A. Nyboe Andersen
Delivery rates after in-vitro fertilization following bilateral salpingectomy due to hydrosalpinges: a case control study
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 1999; 14(1): 101 - 105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.