Human Reproduction, Vol. 11, No. 12, pp. 2618-2622, 1996
© 1996 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
research-article |
Infertility: Higher pregnancy rates with a simple method for Fallopian tube sperm perfusion, using the cervical clamp double nut bivalve speculum in the treatment of unexplained infertility: a prospective randomized study
Mitera' Maternity and Surgical Hospital 6 Er. Stavrou, St., Marousi 151 23, Athens, Greece
Correspondence: Address for correspondence: 8 Ethn. Makanou Street 154 52 P.Psichico, Athens, Greece
The object of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the newly developed cervical clamp double nut bivalve (DNB) speculum used for Fallopian tube sperm perfusion (FSP) with 4 ml of the inseminate, in comparison with standard intrauterine insemination (IUI) using a volume of 0.5 ml of the inseminate. Couples with unexplained infertility (n = 104), undergoing 202 cycles, were enrolled in this study. Cycles were assigned randomly to either IUI (group A, n = 92) or FSP + DNB speculum® (group B, n = 110). Ovarian stimulation was achieved using three different ovarian stimulation protocols in both groups. The age and follicular development of the patients were similar in both groups. The serum hormonal measurements and the endometrial thickness was also similar on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration. The mean (± SD) number of motile spermatozoa inseminated was 44.83 ± 16.57 x 106 in group A and 42.68 ± 13.44 x 106 in group B. In group A (IUI), 11 clinical pregnancies (presence of gestational sac with heart beats) occurred (11.95% per cycle). In group B (FSP + DNB speculum®) 29 clinical pregnancies occurred (26.36% per cycle). These differences were statistically significant (P <0.001). The results of this study for the treatment of unexplained infertility indicate that this simple, well tolerated, inexpensive method of using the DNB speculum for FSP is more successful than standard IUI.
Key words: cervical clamp double nut bivalve speculum/Fallopian tube sperm perfusion/intrauterine insemination/ovarian stimulation/unexplained infertility
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. T. Mansour, H. G. Al-Inany, A. M. Abou-Setta, L. Murad, G. I. Serour, and M. A. Aboulghar Sperm suspension is a highly ultrasonically visible material: a novel model to study uterine activity Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2007; 22(7): 1942 - 1945. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Dias, R. McNamee, and A. Vail Evidence of improving quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in subfertility Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2006; 21(10): 2617 - 2627. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.-M. Vermeylen, T. D'Hooghe, S. Debrock, L. Meeuwis, C. Meuleman, and C. Spiessens The type of catheter has no impact on the pregnancy rate after intrauterine insemination: a randomized study Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2006; 21(9): 2364 - 2367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.E.P. Cantineau, M.J. Heineman, H. Al-Inany, and B.J. Cohlen Intrauterine insemination versus Fallopian tube sperm perfusion in non-tubal subfertility: a systematic review based on a Cochrane review Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2004; 19(12): 2721 - 2729. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
