Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hansen, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gocial, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hansen, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gocial, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 486-489, 1996
© 1996 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Evaluating ovarian reserve: follicle stimulating hormone and oestradiol variability during cycle days 2-5

Leslie M. Hansen2, Frances R. Batzer1,2,3,4, Jacqueline N. Gutmann1,2,3, Stephen L. Corson1,2,3, Maureen P. Kelly1,2,3 and Benjamin Gocial1,2,3

1 Thomas Jefferson University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology 815 Locust Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107–5507, USA 2 Pennsylvania Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology 815 Locust Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107–5507, USA 3 Philadelphia Fertility Institute 815 Locust Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107–5507, USA

Correspondence: 4To whom correspondence should be addressed

A prospective measurement of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and oestradiol between cycle days 2 and 5 was conducted to investigate the intra- and inter-cycle variability in a healthy population of women with regular menstrual intervals. Daily serum samples were obtained from 44 women for a total of 66 cycles on cycle days 2, 3, 4 and 5. FSH concentrations were consistent on all cycle days measured. Oestradiol concentrations on cycle day 2 were not different from cycle day 3, but concentrations on cycle day 4 and cycle day 5 were statistically different from both cycle day 2 and cycle day 3 by analysis of variance (P < 0.05). Evaluation of functional ovarian reserve by cycle day 3 FSH measurement has become the standard in most assisted reproductive technology programmes. The recent change in FSH standardization coupled with the inflexibility of cycle day 3 testing has led to a re-evaluation of testing protocols. Cycle day 3 appears to have emerged as a dictum because most ovulation induction protocols are initiated on cycle day 3, 4 or 5. Flexibility of sampling day can be introduced as suggested by these results. The additional information ascertained from oestradiol testing as applied to evaluation of ovarian reserve warrants further investigation.

Key words: follicle stimulating honnone/oestradiol/ovarian reserve/reproductive potential

Submitted on September 11, 1995; accepted on January 2, 1996.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
K. Lutchman Singh, M. Davies, and R. Chatterjee
Fertility in female cancer survivors: pathophysiology, preservation and the role of ovarian reserve testing
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2005; 11(1): 69 - 89.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Kwee, R. Schats, J. McDonnell, C.B. Lambalk, and J. Schoemaker
Reply: Variability of ovarian reserve tests
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2004; 19(9): 2171 - 2171.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
F.-J. Huang, K.-C. Lan, F.-T. Kung, M.-Y. Tsai, C.-Y. Chang, H.-W. Huang, Y.-C. Lin, and S.-Y. Chang
Human cumulus-free oocyte maturational profile and in vitro developmental potential after stimulation with recombinant versus urinary FSH
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2004; 19(2): 306 - 315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Kwee, M.W. Elting, R. Schats, P.D. Bezemer, C.B. Lambalk, and J. Schoemaker
Comparison of endocrine tests with respect to their predictive value on the outcome of ovarian hyperstimulation in IVF treatment: results of a prospective randomized study
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2003; 18(7): 1422 - 1427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. Eldar-Geva, E.J. Margalioth, A. Ben-Chetrit, M. Gal, D.M. Robertson, D.L. Healy, Y.Z. Diamant, and I.M. Spitz
Serum inhibin B levels measured early during FSH administration for IVF may be of value in predicting the number of oocytes to be retrieved in normal and low responders
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2002; 17(9): 2331 - 2337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
V.A. Akande, C.F. Fleming, L.P. Hunt, S.D. Keay, and J.M. Jenkins
Biological versus chronological ageing of oocytes, distinguishable by raised FSH levels in relation to the success of IVF treatment
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2002; 17(8): 2003 - 2008.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.