Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ford, W.C.L.
Right arrow Articles by Hull, M.G.R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ford, W.C.L.
Right arrow Articles by Hull, M.G.R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 11, No. 7, pp. 1418-1422, 1996
© 1996 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology


research-article

Immunology: The indirect immunobead test for seminal antisperm antibodies and fertilization rates at in-vitro fertifization

W.C.L. Ford1, K.M. Williains, E.A. McLaughlin, S. Harrison, B. Ray and M.G.R. Hull

University Department of Obstetncs and Gynaecology St Michael's Hospital, Southwell Street, Bristol BS2 8EG

Correspondence: 1To whom correspondence should be addressed

A series of 183 palients with positive indirect iminunobead tests on semen was studied to determine the correlation in semen between specific antibody types, binding sites, anti body concentration, and fertilizing ability. IgM was present in only 44 ejaculates and was present in sufficient quantity to cause significant binding to immunobeads (i.e. >20% of motile donor spermatozoa) in only three of them. There was no correlation between the percentages of motile donor spermatozoa that bound IgA and IgG iminunobeads but the two classes of beads generally bound to the same region of the spermatozoa. A total of 63 couples went on to attempt in-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment., all with mature eggs recovered. Of these mature eggs, 44% were fertilized and deaved normally in comparison to 68% in a group of patients with tubal disease. Fertilization rates in individuals followed a bimodal distribution with a substantial number of couples experiencing zero or very poor rates (0–20%), the mode for the remainder lying between 60 and 80%. The fertilization rate tended to decrease as the amount of antibody increased. The percentage of donor spermatozoa that bound to immu nobeads, taken as the greater of IgA and LgG, was selected by logistic regression as a significant predictor of poor fertil ization (rate ≤25%). The predictive power of the equation was improved by induding the motile normal sperm concen tration but the equation could only account for a small pro portion of the total variation in fertilization rate. The presence of antibodies to the sperm head was highly con-el ated with the antibody concentration but was not selected as a predictor of fertilization. We conclude that the nature of the antigen against which the seminal antisperm antibody is directed may be as important as the antibody concentration in affecting sperm function. There seems to be little practical value in measuring 1gM in seminal plasma.

Key words: fertilization rate/indirect immunobead test/IVF/seminal antisperm antibodies


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Paul, S. Harbottle, and J.A. Stewart
Recruitment of sperm donors: the Newcastle-upon-Tyne experience 1994-2003
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2006; 21(1): 150 - 158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.