Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (72)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gunasena, K. T.
Right arrow Articles by Critser, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gunasena, K. T.
Right arrow Articles by Critser, J. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol 12, 101-106, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Live births after autologous transplant of cryopreserved mouse ovaries

KT Gunasena, PM Villines, ES Critser and JK Critser
Cryobiology Research Institute, Methodist Hospital of Indiana, Inc., Indianapolis 46202, USA.

The fertility of mice after autologous transplantation of ovaries, before or after cryopreservation, was investigated in this study. Female mice were randomly assigned to either sham-operated (n = 14), ovariectomized (n = 11), fresh (n = 12) or cryopreserved (n = 11) ovarian transplant groups. Ovaries were cryopreserved in 1.4 M dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) by cooling to -55 degrees C at 0.5 degree C/min (ice nucleation at -7 degrees C), plunged in liquid nitrogen and then thawed at room temperature. Oestrous cyclicity was observed 7 days after sham operation or 15 days after fresh or cryopreserved ovarian transplant. Ovariectomized animals did not demonstrate oestrous cyclicity but were mated, and no pregnancies resulted. Live births were recorded from all sham-operated, all fresh transplant, and 8/11 (73%) cryopreserved transplant animals. Overall mean +/- SEM litter sizes from fresh (4.32 +/- 0.44) and cryopreserved (4.71 +/- 0.57) transplant groups were smaller (P < 0.05) than those of sham-operated animals (12.54 +/- 0.44), although the sizes were not significantly different (P > 0.05) from each other. Animals were mated at least four times, with four litters of live pups from 4/4 sham-operated, 1/10 fresh and 1/9 cryopreserved ovarian transplant animals. Litter sizes from pups of sham-operated and transplant animals were not significantly different from each other. Following autologous transplantation of mouse ovaries, before or after cryopreservation, offspring appeared normal, with high rates of fertility.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
I. Demeestere, P. Simon, S. Emiliani, A. Delbaere, and Y. Englert
Orthotopic and heterotopic ovarian tissue transplantation
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2009; 15(6): 649 - 665.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
V.J. Onions, R. Webb, A.S. McNeilly, and B.K. Campbell
Ovarian endocrine profile and long-term vascular patency following heterotopic autotransplantation of cryopreserved whole ovine ovaries
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2009; 24(11): 2845 - 2855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Histochem. Cytochem.Home page
C.-M. Lu, J. Kwan, A. Baumgartner, J. F. Weier, M. Wang, T. Escudero, S. Munne, H. F. Zitzelsberger, and H.-U. G. Weier
DNA Probe Pooling for Rapid Delineation of Chromosomal Breakpoints
J. Histochem. Cytochem., June 1, 2009; 57(6): 587 - 597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R. Soleimani, J. Van der Elst, E. Heytens, R. Van den Broecke, J. Gerris, M. Dhont, C. Cuvelier, and P. De Sutter
Back muscle as a promising site for ovarian tissue transplantation, an animal model
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2008; 23(3): 619 - 626.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
V.J. Onions, M.R.P. Mitchell, B.K. Campbell, and R. Webb
Ovarian tissue viability following whole ovine ovary cryopreservation: assessing the effects of sphingosine-1-phosphate inclusion
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2008; 23(3): 606 - 618.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. Liu, G.A. Wood, L. Morikawa, R. Ayearst, C. Fleming, and C. McKerlie
Restoration of fertility by orthotopic transplantation of frozen adult mouse ovaries
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2008; 23(1): 122 - 128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
T. Maltaris, M. W Beckmann, H. Binder, A. Mueller, I. Hoffmann, H. Koelbl, and R. Dittrich
The effect of a GnRH agonist on cryopreserved human ovarian grafts in severe combined immunodeficient mice
Reproduction, February 1, 2007; 133(2): 503 - 509.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. Inzunza, A. Morani, G. Cheng, M. Warner, J. Hreinsson, J.-A. Gustafsson, and O. Hovatta
Ovarian wedge resection restores fertility in estrogen receptor beta knockout (ERbeta-/-) mice
PNAS, January 9, 2007; 104(2): 600 - 605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
W. Shen, D. Zhang, T. Qing, J. Cheng, Z. Bai, Y. Shi, M. Ding, and H. Deng
Live Offspring Produced by Mouse Oocytes Derived from Premeiotic Fetal Germ Cells
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2006; 75(4): 615 - 623.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
J. Donnez, B. Martinez-Madrid, P. Jadoul, A. Van Langendonckt, D. Demylle, and M.-M. Dolmans
Ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation: a review
Hum. Reprod. Update, September 1, 2006; 12(5): 519 - 535.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
T. Hani, T. Tachibe, S. Shingai, N. Kamada, O. Ueda, and K.-i. Jishage
Fertility of mice receiving vitrified adult mouse ovaries.
Reproduction, April 1, 2006; 131(4): 681 - 687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
S. J. Silber, K. M. Lenahan, D. J. Levine, J. A. Pineda, K. S. Gorman, M. J. Friez, E. C. Crawford, and R. G. Gosden
Ovarian Transplantation between Monozygotic Twins Discordant for Premature Ovarian Failure
N. Engl. J. Med., July 7, 2005; 353(1): 58 - 63.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
B. Schubert, M. Canis, C. Darcha, C. Artonne, J.-L. Pouly, P. Dechelotte, D. Boucher, and G. Grizard
Human ovarian tissue from cortex surrounding benign cysts: a model to study ovarian tissue cryopreservation
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2005; 20(7): 1786 - 1792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
S. Oehninger
Strategies for Fertility Preservation in Female and Male Cancer Survivors
Reproductive Sciences, May 1, 2005; 12(4): 222 - 231.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D. A. Gook, D.H. Edgar, J. Borg, J. Archer, and J.C. McBain
Diagnostic assessment of the developmental potential of human cryopreserved ovarian tissue from multiple patients using xenografting
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2005; 20(1): 72 - 78.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Revel and J. Schenker
Ovarian tissue banking for cancer patients: is ovarian cortex cryopreservation presently justified?
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2004; 19(1): 14 - 19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D. A. Gook, D.H. Edgar, J. Borg, J. Archer, P.J. Lutjen, and J.C. McBain
Oocyte maturation, follicle rupture and luteinization in human cryopreserved ovarian tissue following xenografting
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2003; 18(9): 1772 - 1781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
Z. Blumenfeld, I. Avivi, M. Ritter, and J. M. Rowe
Preservation of Fertility and Ovarian Function and Minimizing Chemotherapy-Induced Gonadotoxicity in Young Women
Reproductive Sciences, September 1, 1999; 6(5): 229 - 239.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.