Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (51)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gilmore, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Critser, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gilmore, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Critser, J. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol 12, 112-118, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Determination of optimal cryoprotectants and procedures for their addition and removal from human spermatozoa

JA Gilmore, J Liu, DY Gao and JK Critser
Cryobiology Research Institute, Methodist Hospital of Indiana, Indianapolis 46202, USA.

The objective was to test the hypothesis that the optimal cryoprotective agent for cryopreservation of human spermatozoa would be a solute for which cells have the highest plasma membrane permeability, resulting in the least amount of volume excursion during its addition and removal. To test this hypothesis, theoretical simulations were performed using membrane permeability coefficients to predict optimal procedures for the addition and removal of a cryoprotectant. Simulations were performed using data from four different cryoprotectants: (i) glycerol, (ii) dimethyl sulphoxide, (iii) propylene glycol and (iv) ethylene glycol. Thermodynamic formulations were applied to determine approaches for the addition and removal of 1 M and 2 M final concentrations of cryoprotectant, allowing the spermatozoa to maintain a cell volume within their osmotic tolerance limits. Based on these data, ethylene glycol was predicted to be optimal for minimizing volume excursions among the solutes evaluated. These predictions were then experimentally tested using glycerol as the control cryoprotectant and ethylene glycol as the experimental cryoprotectant. The results indicate that there was a higher (P < 0.05) recovery of motile spermatozoa after cryopreservation when using 1 M ethylene glycol than with 1 M glycerol, supporting the hypothesis that use of the cryoprotectant for which the cell has the highest permeability will result in higher cell survival.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
E Isachenko, V Isachenko, J M Weiss, R Kreienberg, I I Katkov, M Schulz, A G-M I Lulat, M J Risopatron, and R Sanchez
Acrosomal status and mitochondrial activity of human spermatozoa vitrified with sucrose
Reproduction, August 1, 2008; 136(2): 167 - 173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
M. R. Fernandez-Santos, M. C. Esteso, V. Montoro, A. J. Soler, and J. J. Garde
Influence of Various Permeating Cryoprotectants on Freezability of Iberian Red Deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) Epididymal Spermatozoa: Effects of Concentration and Temperature of Addition
J Androl, November 1, 2006; 27(6): 734 - 745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S.F. Mullen, Y. Agca, D.C. Broermann, C.L. Jenkins, C.A. Johnson, and J.K. Critser
The effect of osmotic stress on the metaphase II spindle of human oocytes, and the relevance to cryopreservation.
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2004; 19(5): 1148 - 1154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. Isachenko, V. Isachenko, I.I. Katkov, G. Rahimi, T. Schondorf, P. Mallmann, S. Dessole, and F. Nawroth
DNA integrity and motility of human spermatozoa after standard slow freezing versus cryoprotectant-free vitrification
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2004; 19(4): 932 - 939.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. G. Schuster, L. M. Keller, R. L. Dunn, D. A. Ohl, and G. D. Smith
Ultra-rapid freezing of very low numbers of sperm using cryoloops
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2003; 18(4): 788 - 795.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H.-J. Chi, J.-J. Koo, M.-Y. Kim, J.-Y. Joo, S.-S. Chang, and K.-S. Chung
Cryopreservation of human embryos using ethylene glycol in controlled slow freezing
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2002; 17(8): 2146 - 2151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.