Human Reproduction, Vol 12, 241-243, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press
J Farhi, R Homburg, A Ferber, R Orvieto and Z Ben Rafael
The most important aspect of diminished ovarian reserve is the associated
decline in reproductive potential. Assessment of ovarian reserve is mainly
based on measurement of early follicular phase follicle stimulating hormone
(FSH) concentration. The objective of this study was to report the
identification of a group of 12 infertile women initially diagnosed as
having unexplained or anovulatory infertility, who had a normal baseline
hormonal profile and did not respond to repeated ovarian stimulation with
gonadotrophins. All developed ovarian failure within a relatively short
time span. Non-response to ovarian stimulation was defined by failure to
achieve development of follicles >12 mm and failure to raise oestradiol
concentration >350 pmol/l in two successive cycles of human menopausal
gonadotrophin (HMG) doses of up to five ampoules per day for 5-8 days.
Within a mean of 9 months following the failed attempts of ovarian
stimulation the mean day 3 FSH concentrations rose from 5.4 +/- 2.7 IU/l to
53.5 +/- 19.7 IU/l. In these patients, day 3 FSH concentration failed to
indicate the low ovarian reserve manifested only by lack of clinical
response to treatment with gonadotrophins which was the first sign of
impending ovarian failure. We conclude that women with normal early
follicular phase serum FSH concentrations who do not respond to ovarian
stimulation by HMG are at risk of developing ovarian failure within several
months.
ARTICLES
Non-response to ovarian stimulation in normogonadotrophic, normogonadal women: a clinical sign of impending onset of ovarian failure pre- empting the rise in basal follicle stimulating hormone levels
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sakler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. J. Broekmans, M. R. Soules, and B. C. Fauser Ovarian Aging: Mechanisms and Clinical Consequences Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2009; 30(5): 465 - 493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.J. Goverde, J. McDonnell, R. Schats, J.P.W. Vermeiden, R. Homburg, and C.B. Lambalk Ovarian response to standard gonadotrophin stimulation for IVF is decreased not only in older but also in younger women in couples with idiopathic and male subfertility Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2005; 20(6): 1573 - 1577. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Penarrubia, F. Fabregues, D. Manau, M. Creus, G. Casals, R. Casamitjana, F. Carmona, J. A. Vanrell, and J. Balasch Basal and stimulation day 5 anti-Mullerian hormone serum concentrations as predictors of ovarian response and pregnancy in assisted reproductive technology cycles stimulated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist-gonadotropin treatment Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2005; 20(4): 915 - 922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Penarrubia, F. Fabregues, D. Manau, M. Creus, F. Carmona, R. Casamitjana, J. A. Vanrell, and J. Balasch Previous cycle cancellation due to poor follicular development as a predictor of ovarian response in cycles stimulated with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist-gonadotrophin treatment Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2005; 20(3): 622 - 628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Lutchman Singh, M. Davies, and R. Chatterjee Fertility in female cancer survivors: pathophysiology, preservation and the role of ovarian reserve testing Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2005; 11(1): 69 - 89. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Nikolaou and C. Gilling-Smith Early ovarian ageing: are women with polycystic ovaries protected? Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2004; 19(10): 2175 - 2179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Kailasam, S.D. Keay, P. Wilson, W.C.L. Ford, and J.M. Jenkins Defining poor ovarian response during IVF cycles, in women aged <40 years, and its relationship with treatment outcome Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2004; 19(7): 1544 - 1547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Nikolaou and A. Templeton Early ovarian ageing: a hypothesis: Detection and clinical relevance Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2003; 18(6): 1137 - 1139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Lawson, T. El-Toukhy, A. Kassab, A. Taylor, P. Braude, J. Parsons, and P. Seed Poor response to ovulation induction is a stronger predictor of early menopause than elevated basal FSH: a life table analysis Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2003; 18(3): 527 - 533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Eldar-Geva, E.J. Margalioth, A. Ben-Chetrit, M. Gal, D.M. Robertson, D.L. Healy, Y.Z. Diamant, and I.M. Spitz Serum inhibin B levels measured early during FSH administration for IVF may be of value in predicting the number of oocytes to be retrieved in normal and low responders Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2002; 17(9): 2331 - 2337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Fawzy, A. Lambert, R.F. Harrison, P.G. Knight, N. Groome, B. Hennelly, and W.R. Robertson Day 5 inhibin B levels in a treatment cycle are predictive of IVF outcome Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2002; 17(6): 1535 - 1543. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Nikolaou, S. Lavery, C. Turner, R. Margara, and G. Trew Is there a link between an extremely poor response to ovarian hyperstimulation and early ovarian failure? Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2002; 17(4): 1106 - 1111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Dumesic, M. A. Damario, D. R. Session, A. Famuyide, T. G. Lesnick, A. R. Thornhill, and A. S. McNeilly Ovarian Morphology and Serum Hormone Markers as Predictors of Ovarian Follicle Recruitment by Gonadotropins for in VitroFertilization J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2001; 86(6): 2538 - 2543. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Penarrubia, J. Balasch, F. Fabregues, F. Carmona, R. Casamitjana, V. Moreno, J. M Calafell, and J. A. Vanrell Day 5 inhibin B serum concentrations as predictors of assisted reproductive technology outcome in cycles stimulated with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist-gonadotrophin treatment Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2000; 15(7): 1499 - 1504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Luborsky, B. Llanes, R. Roussev, and C. Coulam Ovarian antibodies, FSH and inhibin B: independent markers associated with unexplained infertility Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2000; 15(5): 1046 - 1051. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Gulekli, Y. Bulbul, A. Onvural, K. Yorukoglu, C. Posaci, N. Demir, and O. Erten Accuracy of ovarian reserve tests Hum. Reprod., November 1, 1999; 14(11): 2822 - 2826. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Karande and N. Gleicher A rational approach to the management of low responders in in-vitro fertilization: Opinion Hum. Reprod., July 1, 1999; 14(7): 1744 - 1748. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Noci, M. Maggi, R. Biagiotti, A. D'Agata, L. Criscuoli, and M. Marchionni Serum CA-125 values on the day of oocyte retrieval are not predictive of subsequent pregnancy with in-vitro fertilization Hum. Reprod., July 1, 1999; 14(7): 1773 - 1776. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Raga, F. Bonilla-Musoles, E.M. Casan, and F. Bonilla Recombinant follicle stimulating hormone stimulation in poor responders with normal basal concentrations of follicle stimulating hormone and oestradiol: improved reproductive outcome Hum. Reprod., June 1, 1999; 14(6): 1431 - 1434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



