Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vitale, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by Godke, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vitale, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by Godke, R. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol 12, 310-316, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

In-vitro development of refrozen mouse embryos

NJ Vitale, MW Myers, RS Denniston, SP Leibo and RA Godke
Department of Animal Science, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge 70803, USA.

To evaluate the effects of sequential, repetitive freezing on their in- vitro development, mouse embryos at the eight- to 16-cell stage were subjected to one of five treatments. They were (i) cultured as unfrozen controls, (ii) frozen once and cultured, (iii) subjected to two consecutive freeze-thaw cycles, (iv) frozen and thawed, and then cultured for 18-30 h before being frozen a second time, and (v) frozen three times in succession without being cultured. To assess their functional survival after freezing and thawing, all embryos were cultured in vitro to the hatched blastocyst stage in Whitten's medium. In one experiment, hatched embryos that developed after one, two or three cycles of freezing and thawing were stained with Hoechst 33342 to determine their mean cell number. More embryos of the culture control group and the once-frozen group developed into hatching blastocysts than those of the refrozen groups. There was no difference in the second post-thaw rate of in-vitro development for embryos refrozen with the culture-refreeze or direct-refreeze procedure. Furthermore, there was no difference among in-vitro development rates for embryos frozen two or three times. However, among those embryos subjected to repeated cycles of freezing and thawing that did not survive, there was a considerable amount of damage to their zonae pellucidae. Furthermore, frozen mouse embryos had fewer cells per embryo at the time of hatching than the unfrozen embryos. Nevertheless, these results demonstrate that mouse embryos can survive even three successive freeze-thaw cycles yet still be capable of in-vitro development.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. B. Sheehan, M. Lane, and D. K. Gardner
The CryoLoop facilitates re-vitrification of embryos at four successive stages of development without impairing embryo growth
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2006; 21(11): 2978 - 2984.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Revel, N. Moshe, A. Helman, A. Safran, A. Simon, and M. Koler
Mouse embryos generated from frozen-thawed oocytes can successfully survive a second cryopreservation
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2004; 19(3): 666 - 669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Farhat, B.-S. Zentner, F. Lossos, Y. Bdolah, H. Holtzer, and A. Hurwitz
Successful pregnancy following replacement of embryos previously refrozen at blastocyst stage: Case report
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2001; 16(2): 337 - 339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M.A. Nowshari and G. Brem
Refreezing of murine intact and biopsied embryos by rapid-freezing procedure
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2000; 15(12): 2577 - 2581.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.