Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van den Bergh, M.
Right arrow Articles by Englert, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van den Bergh, M.
Right arrow Articles by Englert, Y.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol 12, 509-513, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press

ARTICLES

Glass wool column filtration, an advantageous way of preparing semen samples for intracytoplasmic sperm injection: an auto-controlled randomized study

M Van den Bergh, P Revelard, E Bertrand, J Biramane, AS Vanin and Y Englert
Fertility Clinic, Erasmus Hospital, French-speaking Free University of Brussels, Belgium.

The characteristics of the glass wool filtration technique for the preparation of semen samples in an intracytoplasmic sperm injection programme (ICSI) were compared with a two-layer Percoll density gradient procedure. Half of each of 25 semen samples were prepared by each technique. The oocytes from each patient were randomly injected, half with spermatozoa prepared by glass wool filtration and half with Percoll-separated spermatozoa from the same semen sample. The percentage of recovered motile spermatozoa, the total motile sperm count, the percentage of morphologically normal forms, the fertilization rate, the cleavage rate and embryo quality obtained with both preparations were analysed. The 95% confidence intervals obtained through the Altman-Bland analysis showed that the percentage of motile spermatozoa recovered was 3.5-9.9% higher with the glass wool filtration technique, and this was highly correlated (r = 0.92, P = 0.0001) to the method. Similarly, the total number of spermatozoa available for ICSI was 0.18 x 10(6)-2.44 x 10(6) higher with the glass wool column and was highly correlated to the method (r = 0.956, P = 0.0001). Also, the percentage of normal forms was 1.25-3.31% higher after glass wool filtration but was poorly correlated to the method (r = 0.47, P = 0.017). Out of 100 metaphase II oocytes injected with glass wool-extracted spermatozoa, 77 fertilized and 72 cleaved. Out of 97 metaphase II oocytes injected with Percoll-selected spermatozoa, 71 fertilized and 69 cleaved. These results were not statistically different. The mean +/- SEM embryo quality score for the glass wool group (2.90 +/- 0.27) was the same as that for the Percoll group (2.80 +/- 0.24). No fertilization failures occurred and 11 patients (44% per oocyte retrieval) became pregnant. It was concluded that glass wool filtration for semen preparation in an ICSI programme offers higher sperm recovery and sperm morphology of superior quality than with the classic two-layer Percoll gradient method, without affecting the fertilization rate and embryo quality.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
S. Grunewald, W. Miska, G. Miska, M. Rasch, M. Reinhardt, H.-J. Glander, and U. Paasch
Molecular glass wool filtration as a new tool for sperm preparation
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2007; 22(5): 1405 - 1412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.