Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Takabatake, K.
Right arrow Articles by Mori, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Takabatake, K.
Right arrow Articles by Mori, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol 12, 583-585, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Intravenous administration of splenocytes in early pregnancy changes the implantation window in mice

K Takabatake, H Fujiwara, Y Goto, T Nakayama, T Higuchi, M Maeda and T Mori
Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Japan.

To clarify the role of immune cells in the reproductive phenomenon during early pregnancy, we investigated the effect of splenocytes obtained from mice in early pregnancy on embryo implantation. We prepared splenocytes from 5 week old pregnant ICR mice on day 4 (pregnancy day 4 splenocytes; P4-spl) and day 8 (pregnancy day 8 splenocytes; P8-spl), from 5 week old pseudopregnant ICR mice on day 4 (pseudopregnancy day 4 splenocytes; PP4-spl) and from 5 week old di- oestrous virgin mice (di-oestrous splenocytes; Di-spl). The supernatants (P4-sup, P8-sup, PP4-sup and Di-sup) derived from the suspensions of P4-spl, P8-spl, PP4-spl and Di-spl respectively, were used in the control groups. The recipient pseudopregnant mice (6 weeks of age) were injected i.v. with splenocytes (2 x 10(7) cells) or supernatants as controls, and embryo transfer was performed on day 2. Embryo implantation was evaluated 7 days later under laparotomy. The successful implantation rate per embryo was markedly higher compared with the control groups in the P4-spl (30.5 +/- 8.55 versus 1.0 +/- 1.37%, n = 200, P < 0.01) and P8-spl (20.1 +/- 10.3 versus 1.17 +/- 1.62%, n = 200, P < 0.05) groups. On the other hand, a slight but not significant increase was observed in the PP4-spl (8.33 +/- 8.80% versus 1.5 +/- 1.37%, n = 200) and Di-spl (9.0 +/- 5.76% versus 2.3 +/- 2.28%, n = 200) groups. Among the splenocyte administration groups, the implantation rate in the P4-spl group was significantly higher than in the PP4-spl and Di-spl groups (P < 0.01). These findings indicate that i.v. administration of splenocytes can change the murine implantation window. Since the splenocytes during early pregnancy are most effective on embryo implantation, peripheral immune cells in early pregnancy may be involved in embryo implantation.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
H. Fujiwara
Do circulating blood cells contribute to maternal tissue remodeling and embryo-maternal cross-talk around the implantation period?
Mol. Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2009; 15(6): 335 - 343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Yoshioka, H. Fujiwara, T. Nakayama, K. Kosaka, T. Mori, and S. Fujii
Intrauterine administration of autologous peripheral blood mononuclear cells promotes implantation rates in patients with repeated failure of IVF-embryo transfer
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2006; 21(12): 3290 - 3294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. Ota, H. Rong, S. Igarashi, and T. Tanaka
Suppression of natural killer cell activity by splenocyte transplantation in a rat model of endometriosis
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2002; 17(6): 1453 - 1458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.