Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dubuisson, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Vacher-Lavenu, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dubuisson, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Vacher-Lavenu, M. C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol 12, 692-698, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press

ARTICLES

Proximal tubal occlusion: is there an alternative to microsurgery?

JB Dubuisson, C Chapron, Y Ansquer and MC Vacher-Lavenu
Service de Chirurgie Gynecologique, Clinique Universitaire Baudelocque, Paris, France.

Fertility outcome following microsurgical tubocornual anastomosis by laparotomy was evaluated. A total of 131 women presenting pure proximal occlusion, whether bilateral or in one tube only, were treated between January 1978 and December 1993. Subsequent fertility was studied in 120 patients, 11 being patients lost to follow-up. Cumulative intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) rate, evaluated by life-table analysis, was 68% at 24 months. The overall IUP rate, calculated from a group of 120 women with follow-up > or = 2 years, and including births and miscarriages, was 70% after 2 years. Comparisons of the cumulative IUP rates show that the fertility outcome is significantly better if the woman is aged < or = 36 years and if tubocornual anastomosis is carried out bilaterally. These results from our personal series confirm that microsurgical tubocornual anastomosis is still of prime importance in the treatment of pure proximal occlusions. Nevertheless, considerable progress in the fields of tubal catheterization, Falloposcopy and in-vitro fertilization techniques raises the question of the management of patients presenting with a proximal tubal occlusion. Here we define the indications for microsurgical tubocornual anastomosis.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.