Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (84)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Munne, S.
Right arrow Articles by Gianaroli, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Munne, S.
Right arrow Articles by Gianaroli, L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol 12, 780-784, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press

ARTICLES

Treatment-related chromosome abnormalities in human embryos

S Munne, C Magli, A Adler, G Wright, K de Boer, D Mortimer, M Tucker, J Cohen and L Gianaroli
Cornell University Medical Center-The New York Hospital, NY 10021, USA.

Mosaicism was studied in good quality embryos from four different centres in order to assess the effects of follicular induction and exposure to laboratory conditions on chromosomal status. The donated embryos were fully biopsied and analysed by fluorescence in-situ hybridization using probes for chromosomes X, Y, 13, 18 and 21, simultaneously. The number of abnormal cells present indicated the division at which mosaicism first occurred (4/4 cells at first division, 2/4 cells at second, 2/8 at third). The rate of mosaicism in embryos from different centres varied greatly (P < 0.001). Most of the mosaic embryos were obtained before 1991. In one clinic increased mosaicism was found in embryos obtained before 1991 when compared to embryos obtained thereafter. The results suggest that certain culture conditions and/or hormonal stimulation protocols may induce chromosomal abnormalities and partly explain differences in pregnancy rates between in-vitro fertilization centres.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
L. Wilton, A. Thornhill, J. Traeger-Synodinos, K.D. Sermon, and J.C. Harper
The causes of misdiagnosis and adverse outcomes in PGD
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2009; 24(5): 1221 - 1228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
M.F.G. Verberg, M.J.C. Eijkemans, N.S. Macklon, E.M.E.W. Heijnen, E.B. Baart, F.P. Hohmann, B.C.J.M. Fauser, and F.J. Broekmans
The clinical significance of the retrieval of a low number of oocytes following mild ovarian stimulation for IVF: a meta-analysis
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2009; 15(1): 5 - 12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
M.F.G. Verberg, N.S. Macklon, G. Nargund, R. Frydman, P. Devroey, F.J. Broekmans, and B.C.J.M. Fauser
Mild ovarian stimulation for IVF
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2009; 15(1): 13 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Hum ReprodHome page
D. Wells, S. Alfarawati, and E. Fragouli
Use of comprehensive chromosomal screening for embryo assessment: microarrays and CGH
Mol. Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2008; 14(12): 703 - 710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
M. Twisk, S. Mastenbroek, A. Hoek, M.-J. Heineman, F. van der Veen, P. M. Bossuyt, S. Repping, and J. C. Korevaar
No beneficial effect of preimplantation genetic screening in women of advanced maternal age with a high risk for embryonic aneuploidy
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2008; 23(12): 2813 - 2817.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
M. Hamel, I. Dufort, C. Robert, C. Gravel, M.-C. Leveille, A. Leader, and M.-A. Sirard
Identification of differentially expressed markers in human follicular cells associated with competent oocytes
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2008; 23(5): 1118 - 1127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Hum ReprodHome page
D.D. Daphnis, E. Fragouli, K. Economou, S. Jerkovic, I.L. Craft, J.D.A. Delhanty, and J.C. Harper
Analysis of the evolution of chromosome abnormalities in human embryos from Day 3 to 5 using CGH and FISH
Mol. Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2008; 14(2): 117 - 125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
S. Ziebe, K. Lundin, R. Janssens, L. Helmgaard, J.-C. Arce, and for the MERIT (Menotrophin vs Recombinant FSH in v
Influence of ovarian stimulation with HP-hMG or recombinant FSH on embryo quality parameters in patients undergoing IVF
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2007; 22(9): 2404 - 2413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
E. B. Baart, E. Martini, M. J. Eijkemans, D. Van Opstal, N. G.M. Beckers, A. Verhoeff, N. S. Macklon, and B. C.J.M. Fauser
Milder ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization reduces aneuploidy in the human preimplantation embryo: a randomized controlled trial
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2007; 22(4): 980 - 988.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
P. Donoso, C. Staessen, B.C.J.M. Fauser, and P. Devroey
Current value of preimplantation genetic aneuploidy screening in IVF
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2007; 13(1): 15 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Endocr. Rev.Home page
N. S. Macklon, R. L. Stouffer, L. C. Giudice, and B. C. J. M. Fauser
The Science behind 25 Years of Ovarian Stimulation for in Vitro Fertilization
Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2006; 27(2): 170 - 207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
L. Wilton
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and chromosome analysis of blastomeres using comparative genomic hybridization
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2005; 11(1): 33 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
D.D. Daphnis, J.D.A. Delhanty, S. Jerkovic, J. Geyer, I. Craft, and J.C. Harper
Detailed FISH analysis of day 5 human embryos reveals the mechanisms leading to mosaic aneuploidy
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2005; 20(1): 129 - 137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Hum ReprodHome page
J. Inzunza, S. Sahlen, K. Holmberg, A.-M. Stromberg, H. Teerijoki, E. Blennow, O. Hovatta, and H. Malmgren
Comparative genomic hybridization and karyotyping of human embryonic stem cells reveals the occurrence of an isodicentric X chromosome after long-term cultivation
Mol. Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2004; 10(6): 461 - 466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Hum ReprodHome page
M.G. Katz-Jaffe, A.O. Trounson, and D.S. Cram
Mitotic errors in chromosome 21 of human preimplantation embryos are associated with non-viability
Mol. Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2004; 10(2): 143 - 147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
F. J. Los, D. Van Opstal, and C. van den Berg
The development of cytogenetically normal, abnormal and mosaic embryos: a theoretical model
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2004; 10(1): 79 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
J. G. Derhaag, E. Coonen, M. Bras, J.M. Bergers Janssen, R. Ignoul-Vanvuchelen, J. P.M. Geraedts, J. L.H. Evers, and J. C.M. Dumoulin
Chromosomally abnormal cells are not selected for the extra-embryonic compartment of the human preimplantation embryo at the blastocyst stage
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2003; 18(12): 2565 - 2574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
S. Ziebe, K. Lundin, A. Loft, C. Bergh, A. Nyboe Andersen, U. Selleskog, D. Nielsen, C. Grondahl, H. Kim, and J.-C. Arce
FISH analysis for chromosomes 13, 16, 18, 21, 22, X and Y in all blastomeres of IVF pre-embryos from 144 randomly selected donated human oocytes and impact on pre-embryo morphology
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2003; 18(12): 2575 - 2581.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
C. J. Bean, T. J. Hassold, L. Judis, and P. A. Hunt
Fertilization in vitro increases non-disjunction during early cleavage divisions in a mouse model system
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2002; 17(9): 2362 - 2367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Hum ReprodHome page
H. Malmgren, S. Sahlen, J. Inzunza, M. Aho, B. Rosenlund, M. Fridstrom, O. Hovatta, L. Ahrlund-Richter, M. Nordenskjold, and E. Blennow
Single cell CGH analysis reveals a high degree of mosaicism in human embryos from patients with balanced structural chromosome aberrations
Mol. Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2002; 8(5): 502 - 510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
M. Bielanska, S. L. Tan, and A. Ao
Chromosomal mosaicism throughout human preimplantation development in vitro: incidence, type, and relevance to embryo outcome
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2002; 17(2): 413 - 419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
M. Sandalinas, S. Sadowy, M. Alikani, G. Calderon, J. Cohen, and S. Munne
Developmental ability of chromosomally abnormal human embryos to develop to the blastocyst stage
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2001; 16(9): 1954 - 1958.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
G. Nargund, J. Waterstone, J.M. Bland, Z. Philips, J. Parsons, and S. Campbell
Cumulative conception and live birth rates in natural (unstimulated) IVF cycles
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2001; 16(2): 259 - 262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
J. C.M. Dumoulin, E. Coonen, M. Bras, J.M. Bergers-Janssen, R. C.M. Ignoul-Vanvuchelen, L. C.P. van Wissen, J. P.M. Geraedts, and J. L.H. Evers
Embryo development and chromosomal anomalies after ICSI: effect of the injection procedure
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2001; 16(2): 306 - 312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Hum ReprodHome page
D. Wells and J. D.A. Delhanty
Comprehensive chromosomal analysis of human preimplantation embryos using whole genome amplification and single cell comparative genomic hybridization
Mol. Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2000; 6(11): 1055 - 1062.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
L. Scott, R. Alvero, M. Leondires, and B. Miller
The morphology of human pronuclear embryos is positively related to blastocyst development and implantation
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2000; 15(11): 2394 - 2403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Hum ReprodHome page
C. Staessen, E. Van Assche, H. Joris, M. Bonduelle, M. Vandervorst, I. Liebaers, and A. Van Steirteghem
Clinical experience of sex determination by fluorescent in-situ hybridization for preimplantation genetic diagnosis
Mol. Hum. Reprod., April 1, 1999; 5(4): 382 - 389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
M.C. Magli, L. Gianaroli, D. Fortini, A.P. Ferraretti, and S. Munne
Impact of blastomere biopsy and cryopreservation techniques on human embryo viability
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 1999; 14(3): 770 - 773.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.