Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coulam, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Dorfmann, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coulam, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Dorfmann, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol 12, 823-826, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Comparison of ultrasonographic findings in spontaneous abortions with normal and abnormal karyotypes

CB Coulam, C Goodman and A Dorfmann
Genetics & IVF Institute, Fairfax, VA 22031, USA.

To determine whether ultrasonographic findings can predict the karyotype of spontaneous abortions, 137 pregnancies (54 spontaneous, 83 assisted ovulatory cycles) that subsequently aborted and had chromosome analysis performed on the products of conception were studied ultrasonographically. Transvaginal ultrasound was performed using an Acuson 128XP/10 with 7.5 MHz probe. The numbers of empty gestational sacs, small and normal for gestational size, embryonic poles and embryos with documented cardiac activity were calculated. The frequency of each of these findings in pregnancies with normal and abnormal karyotypes was compared. Of the 137 spontaneous abortions, 51 had normal chromosome analyses and 86 had abnormal karyotypes (68 aneuploidies and 18 polyploidies). Ultrasonographic findings in the 51 karyotypically normal pregnancies included 16 (31%) with empty gestational sacs, and 35 (69%) with embryonic poles, of which 24 (69%) were at least 1 week smaller than expected for gestational age and 11 (31%) were the expected size. Embryonic cardiac activity was documented in 22 (63%) of the 35 embryonic poles. Amongst 86 pregnancies with abnormal karyotypes, similar frequencies of ultrasound findings were found: 23 (27%) with empty gestational sacs, 42 (67%) with embryonic poles smaller than expected for gestational age, and 50 (79%) embryos lost after documentation of embryonic cardiac activity. No differences in the frequency of ultrasonographic findings of empty gestational sacs, small embryonic pole and embryonic cardiac activity were observed between karyotypically normal and abnormal spontaneous abortions. Ultrasonographic findings cannot predict the karyotype of spontaneous abortions.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Wieringa-de Waard, J. Vos, G. J. Bonsel, P. J.E. Bindels, and W. M. Ankum
Management of miscarriage: a randomized controlled trial of expectant management versus surgical evacuation
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2002; 17(9): 2445 - 2450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Wieringa-de Waard, E. E. Hartman, W. M. Ankum, J. B. Reitsma, P. J.E. Bindels, and G. J. Bonsel
Expectant management versus surgical evacuation in first trimester miscarriage: health-related quality of life in randomized and non-randomized patients
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2002; 17(6): 1638 - 1642.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.