Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Terriou, P.
Right arrow Articles by Roulier, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Terriou, P.
Right arrow Articles by Roulier, R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol 12, 1069-1072, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press

ARTICLES

Teratozoospermia influences fertilization rate in vitro but not embryo quality

P Terriou, C Giorgetti, P Auquier, E Hans, JL Spach, J Salzmann and R Roulier
Institut de Medecine de la Reproduction, Marseille, France.

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare the overall results and embryo quality in 102 cycles of in-vitro fertilization (IVF)-embryo transfer using normal frozen donor semen (group D) and 94 cycles of IVF-embryo transfer using husbands' teratozoospermic sperm (group T). Donor semen was purchased from men with proven fertility and normal semen parameters. Teratozoospermia was defined in group T as the presence of <20% of normal spermatozoa in semen on the day of oocyte retrieval. Exclusion criteria were a sperm count <10 x 10(6)/ml or with <10% progressive motility. Fertilization rate, transfer rate and number of transferred embryos per cycle were significantly lower in the teratozoospermic group (45 vs 72%, 66 vs 96%, 1.7 vs 2.9%, respectively). Pregnancy rate per cycle was also lower, but not significantly (18 vs 28%). However, pregnancy rate per transfer, implantation rate per transferred embryo and take home baby rate were comparable (27 vs 30%, 15 vs 15%, 21 vs 24%, respectively). Similarly, embryo quality in terms of number of embryos displaying fragmentations or irregular cells, cleavage stages and embryo scores were comparable. When group T was divided into two subgroups according to sperm count (group T1: sperm count = 10-20 x 10(6)/ml; group T2: sperm count >20 x 10(6)/ml), there was no difference between them with regard to fertilization rate, pregnancy rate or embryo quality. This study confirms low pregnancy rate per cycle in IVF-embryo transfer using teratozoospermic semen, but demonstrates for the first time that embryo quality and viability are not impaired. It is proposed that the poor pregnancy rate per cycle obtained is due only to the poor fertilization rate, and to the subsequent limited choice of embryos to be transferred.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.