Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Flaherty, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Aitken, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Flaherty, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Aitken, R. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol 12, 938-942, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press

ARTICLES

Albumin gradients do not enrich Y-bearing human spermatozoa

SP Flaherty, J Michalowska, NJ Swann, WP Dmowski, CD Matthews and RJ Aitken
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, Australia.

The aim of this study was to evaluate objectively whether or not discontinuous albumin gradients enrich the proportion of Y-bearing human sperm. A blinded, collaborative trial design was employed whereby a licensed centre prepared the sperm fractions using licensed procedures, coded the sperm slides and then sent them to an independent laboratory for determination of the X:Y ratio in each sperm fraction using X and Y chromosome-specific probes and double label fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH). The identification codes and FISH results were collated by an independent third observer. Two albumin gradient methods which are currently used by licensed centres for male sex pre- selection, protocol 3 and modified protocol 3, were tested. Essentially the same results were obtained for the two methods. Highly motile sperm fractions were recovered from the albumin gradients, and the recoveries of motile spermatozoa (1.3-8.5%) were within the optimal range reported to produce maximal enrichment of Y-bearing spermatozoa. FISH analysis, however, revealed no enrichment for Y-bearing spermatozoa with either method, and the overall X:Y ratios were not significantly different from 1.0. Some samples showed marginal enrichment of Y-bearing spermaotozoa, whereas others showed marginal enrichment of X-bearing spermaotozoa. In conclusion, this collaborative study has demonstrated that the protocol 3 and modified protocol 3 albumin gradient procedures do not enrich Y-bearing spermatozoa. The clinical use of albumin gradients for male sex preselection should be reconsidered in the light of this and other evidence.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
A.L. Kalfoglou, J. Scott, and K. Hudson
Attitudes about preconception sex selection: a focus group study with Americans
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2008; 23(12): 2731 - 2736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.