Human Reproduction, Vol 12, 963-966, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press
R Woolcott and J Stanger
Transvaginal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer was performed on 121
consecutive patients. Observation was made of guiding cannula and transfer
catheter placement in relation to the endometrial surface and uterine
fundus during embryo transfer. The position and movement of a
transfer-associated air bubble and the impact of subendometrial myometrial
contraction leading to endometrial movement was observed. Results indicate
that tactile assessment of embryo transfer catheter placement is
unreliable: in 17.4% of transfers the outer guiding catheter inadvertently
abutted the fundal endometrium. The outer guiding cannula indented the
endometrium in 24.8% and the transfer catheter embedded in the endometrium
in 33.1%. Unavoidable sub- endometrial transfers occurred in 22.3% of
transfers. Ultrasound-guided transfer avoided accidental tubal transfer in
7.4% of transfers. Transfer catheter withdrawal did not significantly
affect embryo transfer-associated air bubble position. Endometrial movement
due to sub-endometrial myometrial contraction was obvious in 36.4% of
cases, with active motion of the transfer-associated air bubble occurring
in 28.1%. Pregnancies occurred in 45.5% of transfers with endometrial
movement compared to 15.6% (P < 0.001) without.
ARTICLES
Potentially important variables identified by transvaginal ultrasound- guided embryo transfer
Lingard Fertility Centre, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. T. Mansour, H. G. Al-Inany, A. M. Abou-Setta, L. Murad, G. I. Serour, and M. A. Aboulghar Sperm suspension is a highly ultrasonically visible material: a novel model to study uterine activity Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2007; 22(7): 1942 - 1945. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Coroleu, P. N. Barri, O. Carreras, I. Belil, R. Buxaderas, A. Veiga, and J. Balasch Effect of using an echogenic catheter for ultrasound-guided embryo transfer in an IVF programme: a prospective, randomized, controlled study Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2006; 21(7): 1809 - 1815. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Abou-Setta, H. G. Al-Inany, R. T. Mansour, G. I. Serour, and M. A. Aboulghar Soft versus firm embryo transfer catheters for assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2005; 20(11): 3114 - 3121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. I. Shamonki, G. L. Schattman, S. D. Spandorfer, P. H. Chung, and Z. Rosenwaks Ultrasound-guided trial transfer may be beneficial in preparation for an IVF cycle Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2005; 20(10): 2844 - 2849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. I. Shamonki, S. D. Spandorfer, and Z. Rosenwaks Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer and the accuracy of trial embryo transfer Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2005; 20(3): 709 - 716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Mansour Minimizing embryo expulsion after embryo transfer: a randomized controlled study Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2005; 20(1): 170 - 174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Prapas, Y. Prapas, Y. Panagiotidis, S. Prapa, P. Vanderzwalmen, and G. Makedos Cervical dilatation has a positive impact on the outcome of IVF in randomly assigned cases having two previous difficult embryo transfers Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2004; 19(8): 1791 - 1795. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.G. Franco Jr, A.M.V.C. Martins, R.L.R. Baruffi, A.L. Mauri, C.G. Petersen, V. Felipe, P. Contart, A. Pontes, and J.B.A. Oliveira Best site for embryo transfer: the upper or lower half of endometrial cavity? Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2004; 19(8): 1785 - 1790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Eytan, D. Elad, U. Zaretsky, and A. J. Jaffa A glance into the uterus during in vitro simulation of embryo transfer Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2004; 19(3): 562 - 569. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.B. Henne and A.A. Milki Uterine position at real embryo transfer compared with mock embryo transfer Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2004; 19(3): 570 - 572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Alvero, R.M. Hearns-Stokes, W.H. Catherino, M.P. Leondires, and J.H. Segars The presence of blood in the transfer catheter negatively influences outcome at embryo transfer Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2003; 18(9): 1848 - 1852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Coroleu, P. N. Barri, O. Carreras, F. Martinez, A. Veiga, and J. Balasch The usefulness of ultrasound guidance in frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a prospective randomized clinical trial Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2002; 17(11): 2885 - 2890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Tomas, K. Tikkinen, L. Tuomivaara, J. S. Tapanainen, and H. Martikainen The degree of difficulty of embryo transfer is an independent factor for predicting pregnancy Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2002; 17(10): 2632 - 2635. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Matorras, E. Urquijo, R. Mendoza, B. Corcostegui, A. Exposito, and F.J. Rodriguez-Escudero Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer improves pregnancy rates and increases the frequency of easy transfers Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2002; 17(7): 1762 - 1766. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.N. Sallam, A.F. Agameya, A.F. Rahman, F. Ezzeldin, and A.N. Sallam Ultrasound measurement of the uterocervical angle before embryo transfer: a prospective controlled study Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2002; 17(7): 1767 - 1772. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
