Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bhattacharya, S.
Right arrow Articles by Templeton, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bhattacharya, S.
Right arrow Articles by Templeton, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol 12, 1440-1442, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

How effective is patient-controlled analgesia? A randomized comparison of two protocols for pain relief during oocyte recovery

S Bhattacharya, F MacLennan, MP Hamilton and A Templeton
University Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aberdeen Maternity Hospital, UK.

Although the conventional method of pain relief during outpatient oocyte recovery involves physician-administered drugs, patient- controlled analgesia (PCA) offers an alternative technique with the potential to give women more control over peroperative analgesia. We conducted a prospective randomized study to compare the effect of fentanyl administered either through a PCA delivery system or by a physician. Thirty-nine women were randomized to PCA during egg collection while 42 were allocated to receive intermittent doses administered by a physician. Pain was evaluated by means of a 100 mm linear analogue scale. The mean (SD) pain score in the PCA group was 38.5 (19.8) while in the other group it was 46.1 (21.3) (P = 0.1). In the PCA group, 64% of women felt very satisfied with their analgesia as compared with 57% in the non-PCA group (P = 0.6). Among the PCA users, 39% of demands were successful. Significantly more fentanyl (97.5 microg) was used in the PCA group than in the other group (84.6 microg) (P = 0.03). Though intraoperative PCA with fentanyl is an effective alternative to physician-administered techniques, many women still feel the need for more analgesia during the procedure.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
I. Kwan, S. Bhattacharya, F. Knox, and A. McNeil
Conscious sedation and analgesia for oocyte retrieval during IVF procedures: a Cochrane review.
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2006; 21(7): 1672 - 1679.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. Stener-Victorin
The pain-relieving effect of electro-acupuncture and conventional medical analgesic methods during oocyte retrieval: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 339 - 349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. H. Y. Ng, O. S. Tang, D. K. C. Chui, and P. C. Ho
Comparison of two different doses of lignocaine used in paracervical block during oocyte collection in an IVF programme
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2000; 15(10): 2148 - 2151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. H. Y. Ng, O. S. Tang, D. K. C. Chui, and P. C. Ho
A prospective, randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled study to assess the efficacy of paracervical block in the pain relief during egg collection in IVF
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 1999; 14(11): 2783 - 2787.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.