Human Reproduction, Vol 12, 1847-1850, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press
JA Collins
An informal survey among colleagues turns up the far-from surprising
information that the average patient contact involves at least three or
four judgements and decisions: judgements about aetiology and prognosis,
decisions about diagnosis and therapy, and sometimes discussions about
costs and side-effects. And so it goes: 20 patients a day, 60 decisions;
100 patients a week, 300 decisions. Who makes these decisions, the doctor
or the patient? What factors govern the final choice in each case?
Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is the factor getting a lot of attention
these days, but clinical decisions depend on many different elements. Good
doctors have always made use of experience and judgement as well as the
best available evidence.
REVIEWS
Clinical research evidence and clinical practice
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Z. Z. Zhao, D. R. Nyholt, S. Thomas, S. A. Treloar, and G. W. Montgomery Polymorphisms in the vascular endothelial growth factor gene and the risk of familial endometriosis Mol. Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2008; 14(9): 531 - 538. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.M. Farquhar, A. Prentice, D.H. Barlow, J.L.H. Evers, P. Vandekerckhove, and A. Vail Effective treatment of subfertility: introducing the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Hum. Reprod., July 1, 1999; 14(7): 1678 - 1683. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

