Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hata, T.
Right arrow Articles by Senoh, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hata, T.
Right arrow Articles by Senoh, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol 12, 1873-1876, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Assessment of embryonic anatomy at 6-8 weeks of gestation by intrauterine and transvaginal sonography

T Hata, A Manabe, K Makihara, K Hata, K Miyazaki and D Senoh
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shimane Medical University, Izumo, Japan.

Our purpose was to compare the ultrasound visualization of the early first-trimester embryo using transvaginal and intrauterine sonography. In all, 32 women about to undergo therapeutic abortion at 6-8.9 weeks gestation were studied using a specially developed catheter-based, high- resolution, real-time miniature (2.4 mm outer diameter) ultrasonography transducer (20 MHz). Before the intrauterine sonographic procedure was performed, transvaginal sonographic assessment of the embryo was conducted. The parameters evaluated included the ability to visualize anatomical structures and a subjective assessment of the overall image clarity. The ability to view most organs was better with intrauterine sonography compared to transvaginal sonography, and this was especially true for the brain, spine, heart, liver, midgut herniation, extremities, and sacral tail. Moreover, it was possible to obtain finer image quality of very small embryonic structures with intrauterine sonography than with transvaginal sonography. Stomach, spleen, kidney, and bladder could not be depicted with both techniques. One cystic hygroma was diagnosed at 7 weeks 6 days using intrauterine sonography, but not with transvaginal sonography. Intrauterine sonography may provide additional information on the visualization of anatomical structures of the embryo in the early first trimester of pregnancy. In this limited series, one case of cystic hygroma was demonstrated and, thus, there is a potential for its use in the early detection of embryonic malformation. These results suggest that intrauterine sonography may be a valuable tool in imaging the early first-trimester embryo, complementing and not replacing transvaginal sonography in high- risk pregnancies.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. Tanaka, D. Senoh, T. Yanagihara, and T. Hata
Intrauterine sonographic measurement of embryonic brain vesicle
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2000; 15(6): 1407 - 1412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D. Senoh, H. Tanaka, M. Akiyama, T. Yanagihara, and T. Hata
Saline infusion contrast intrauterine sonographic assessment of the endometrium with high-frequency, real-time miniature transducer in normal menstrual cycle: a preliminary report
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 1999; 14(10): 2600 - 2603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D. Senoh, T. Yanagihara, M. Akiyama, Y. Ohnishi, C. Yamashiro, H. Tanaka, K. Hayashi, and T. Hata
Laparoscopy-assisted intrapelvic sonography with a high-frequency, real-time miniature transducer for assessment of the Fallopian tube: a preliminary report
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 1999; 14(3): 704 - 706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.