Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hu, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Worrilow, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hu, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Worrilow, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol 13, 165-168, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Co-culture with assisted hatching of human embryos using Buffalo rat liver cells

Y Hu, W Maxson, D Hoffman, S Ory, S Eager, J Dupre and K Worrilow
Northwest Centre for Infertility and Reproductive Endocrinology, Margate, FL 33063, USA.

Commercially obtained Buffalo rat liver (BRL) cells were grown in monolayer culture. The effect of BRL cell co-culture with assisted hatching on embryo development, implantation and pregnancy was investigated in a population of 200 'first-time' in-vitro fertilization (IVF) patients, subdivided into three groups according to the methods of fertilization [IVF; intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI); ICSI/IVF]. Assisted hatching was performed on all embryos chosen for transfer. Following co-culture, the overall embryo quality, implantation rate and pregnancy rates were not significantly different from the controls. However, when grouped according to fertilization method, co-culture was found to have an impact on pregnancy and implantation rates in the group undergoing conventional IVF. Using co- culture with assisted hatching, we were able to achieve a 58% (38/65) clinical pregnancy rate with a 49% (32/65) live birth rate and a 26% (60/235) implantation rate. No changes in the pregnancy and implantation rates were apparent in ICSI or ICSI/IVF subgroups. This is the first prospective, randomly controlled study which reports the use of BRL cell co-culture for human IVF for a large number of patients undergoing IVF for the first time.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J.D.M. Nicopoullos, C. Gilling-Smith, P.A. Almeida, S. Homa, L. Nice, H. Tempest, and J.W.A. Ramsay
The role of sperm aneuploidy as a predictor of the success of intracytoplasmic sperm injection?
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2008; 23(2): 240 - 250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
J. Tesarik and C. Mendoza
Using the Male Gamete for Assisted Reproduction: Past, Present, and Future
J Androl, May 1, 2003; 24(3): 317 - 328.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Friedler, A. Raziel, D. Strassburger, M. Schachter, Y. Soffer, and R. Ron-El
Factors influencing the outcome of ICSI in patients with obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia: a comparative study
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2002; 17(12): 3114 - 3121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. De Rycke, I. Liebaers, and A. Van Steirteghem
Epigenetic risks related to assisted reproductive technologies: Risk analysis and epigenetic inheritance
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2002; 17(10): 2487 - 2494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. J. Boerrigter, J. J. de Bie, B. M.J.L. Mannaerts, B. P. van Leeuwen, and D. P.J. Passier-Timmermans
Obstetrical and neonatal outcome after controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF using the GnRH antagonist ganirelix
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2002; 17(8): 2027 - 2034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. D. Palermo, L. T. Colombero, J. J. Hariprashad, P. N. Schlegel, and Z. Rosenwaks
Chromosome analysis of epididymal and testicular sperm in azoospermic patients undergoing ICSI
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2002; 17(3): 570 - 575.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. C.M. Dumoulin, E. Coonen, M. Bras, J.M. Bergers-Janssen, R. C.M. Ignoul-Vanvuchelen, L. C.P. van Wissen, J. P.M. Geraedts, and J. L.H. Evers
Embryo development and chromosomal anomalies after ICSI: effect of the injection procedure
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2001; 16(2): 306 - 312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. Horne, A. Atkinson, D.R. Brison, J. Radford, J.A.L. Yin, E.C.O. Edi-Osagie, E.H.E. Pease, and B.A. Lieberman
Achieving pregnancy against the odds: successful implantation of frozen-thawed embryos generated by ICSI using spermatozoa banked prior to chemo/radiotherapy for Hodgkin's disease and acute leukaemia: Case Report
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2001; 16(1): 107 - 109.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
Th. Hardarson, K. Lundin, and L. Hamberger
The position of the metaphase II spindle cannot be predicted by the location of the first polar body in the human oocyte
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2000; 15(6): 1372 - 1376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R. H. Martin, C. Greene, A. Rademaker, L. Barclay, E. Ko, and J. Chernos
Chromosome analysis of spermatozoa extracted from testes of men with non-obstructive azoospermia
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2000; 15(5): 1121 - 1124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
U.-B. Wennerholm, C. Bergh, L. Hamberger, G. Westlander, M. Wikland, and M. Wood
Obstetric outcome of pregnancies following ICSI, classified according to sperm origin and quality
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2000; 15(5): 1189 - 1194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
Optimal use of infertility diagnostic tests and treatments
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2000; 15(3): 723 - 732.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. C.M. Dumoulin, E. Coonen, M. Bras, L. C.P. van Wissen, R. Ignoul-Vanvuchelen, J.M. Bergers-Jansen, J. G. Derhaag, J. P.M. Geraedts, and J. L.H. Evers
Comparison of in-vitro development of embryos originating from either conventional in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2000; 15(2): 402 - 409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
ESHRE Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) Consortium: preliminary assessment of data from January 1997 to September 1998
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 1999; 14(12): 3138 - 3148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
A. Leader
New reproductive technologies: Why are we limiting choices for infertile couples?
Can. Med. Assoc. J., November 1, 1999; 161(11): 1411 - 1412.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
B. Peschka, J. Leygraaf, K. Van der Ven, M. Montag, B. Schartmann, R. Schubert, H. Van der Ven, and G. Schwanitz
Type and frequency of chromosome aberrations in 781 couples undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 1999; 14(9): 2257 - 2263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Loft, K. Petersen, K. Erb, A.L. Mikkelsen, J. Grinsted, F. Hald, J. Hindkjar, K.M. Nielsen, P. Lundstrom, A. Gabrielsen, et al.
A Danish national cohort of 730 infants born after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) 1994–1997
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 1999; 14(8): 2143 - 2148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D. C. Page, S. Silber, and L. G. Brown
Men with infertility caused by AZFc deletion can produce sons by intracytoplasmic sperm injection, but are likely to transmit the deletion and infertility
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 1999; 14(7): 1722 - 1726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R.G. Edwards and H. K. Beard
Is the success of human IVF more a matter of genetics and evolution than growing blastocysts?
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 1999; 14(1): 1 - 6.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.