Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Auroux, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lapaquellerie, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Auroux, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lapaquellerie, N.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol 13, 55-59, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press

ARTICLES

Post-pubescent to mature fathers: increase in progeny quality?

M Auroux, NN Nawar, M Naguib, M Baud and N Lapaquellerie
Biologie de la Reproduction et du Developpement, CHU de Bicetre, Universite Paris XI, Kremlin Bicetre, France.

In the mouse, offspring born from mature fathers exhibit better behavioural performances (for spontaneous activity in both sex and learning capacity in males) than those born from post-pubescent fathers. These behavioural variations are not accompanied by other obvious modifications. They could correspond to what has been observed in man relating to the results in a psychometric test undergone by male progeny born from very young to mature fathers. These data and those which show a decrease in mental performance in rats and human males born from mature to senescent fathers suggest the participation of some genetic factors in these phenomena.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J AndrolHome page
D. T. Carrell and D. Cartmill
A Brief Review of Current and Proposed Federal Government Regulation of Assisted Reproduction Laboratories in the United States
J Androl, September 1, 2002; 23(5): 611 - 617.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
A. Botchan, R. Hauser, R. Gamzu, L. Yogev, G. Paz, and H. Yavetz
Results of 6139 artificial insemination cycles with donor spermatozoa
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2001; 16(11): 2298 - 2304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
L. Frith
Gamete donation and anonymity: The ethical and legal debate
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2001; 16(5): 818 - 824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
T. Navarrete, A. Johnson, B. Mixon, and D. Wolf
The relationship between fertility potential measurements on cryobanked semen and fecundity of sperm donors
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2000; 15(2): 344 - 350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.