Human Reproduction, Vol. 13, No. 10, 2688-2692,
October 1998
© 1998 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
A comparative prospective study of a chronic low dose versus a conventional ovulation stimulation regimen using recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone in anovulatory infertile women
1 Arnaud de Villeneuve University Hospital, F-34259 Montpellier Cedex 5, France 2 Jean Verdier Hospital, F-93140 Bondy, France 3 Private Institute, F-33000 Bordeaux, France 4 Clinique Pasteur Saint Esprit, F-29200 Brest, France 5 Rhonalpin Institute, F-69500 Bron, France 6 Muette Clinic, F-75016 Paris, France 7 Ares-Serono, Geneva, Switzerland 8 Laboratoires Serono, France
Correspondence: To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Hôpital Universitaire Arnaud de Villeneuve, 371 Avenue Doyer G. Giraud, 34259 Montpellier Cedex 5, France. E-mail: bhiffs{at}mnet.fr
The efficacy and safety of a chronic low dose (group A) and a conventional (group B) stimulation regimen of recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (r-HFSH) were compared in 103 WHO Group II infertile women with clomiphene citrate-resistant anovulation. Mono- or bifollicular development was induced in 88.1% of patients in group A compared with 76.1% in group B. Ovulation and pregnancy rates were higher in group A (71.4% and 33.3%, respectively) than in group B (63.0% and 20%), but these differences were not statistically significant. Additionally, the total number of follicles that were >10 mm diameter was lower in group A than group B (3.0 ± 2.6 versus 6.3 ± 6.5; P < 0.0001), as was the oestradiol concentration (504 ± 477 pg/ml versus 988 ± 740 pg/ml; P < 0.03). The median dose of FSH (75 IU ampoules) used per cycle was 11 ampoules in group A and 12.5 in group B. In terms of the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, no differences were recorded between the two groups. The results demonstrated that r-HFSH is effective and safe in both these treatment protocols. The chronic low dose regimen was associated with a trend towards a higher rate of mono- or bifollicular development, without jeopardizing the incidence of pregnancy.
Key words: anovulation/induction of ovulation/low-dose/r-HFSH
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J.N. Hugues, I. Cedrin-Durnerin, C.M. Howles, and On Behalf of the Recombinant FSH OI Study Group The use of a decremental dose regimen in patients treated with a chronic low-dose step-up protocol for WHO Group II anovulation: a prospective randomized multicentre study Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2006; 21(11): 2817 - 2822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Christin-Maitre, J.N. Hugues, and on behalf of the Recombinant FSH Study Group A comparative randomized multicentric study comparing the step-up versus step-down protocol in polycystic ovary syndrome Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2003; 18(8): 1626 - 1631. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. van Wely, N. Bayram, and F. van der Veen Recombinant FSH in alternative doses or versus urinary gonadotrophins for ovulation induction in subfertility associated with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review based on a Cochrane review Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2003; 18(6): 1143 - 1149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
