Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (43)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mettler, L.
Right arrow Articles by Jonat, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mettler, L.
Right arrow Articles by Jonat, W.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 13, No. 10, 2748-2750, October 1998
© 1998 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

One year of experience working with the aid of a robotic assistant (the voice-controlled optic holder AESOP) in gynaecological endoscopic surgery

L. Mettler, M. Ibrahim and W. Jonat

Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Kiel, Michaelisstr. 16, 24105 Kiel, Germany

Correspondence: To whom correspondence should be addressed

The aim of the study was a comparison of robotic versus human laparoscopic camera control. Utilizing robotic technology a robot has been designed specifically for the purpose of holding and manoeuvring the laparoscope under the direct control of the surgeon. We tested AESOP (automated endoscopic system for optimal positioning) in 50 patients undergoing routine gynaecological endoscopic surgical procedures. The elimination of the camera holder allows two doctors to perform complex laparoscopic surgery faster than without the robotic arm. The timing of surgical procedures performed by surgeons using the voice control was compared to the timing of similar operations using the foot or hand control. The voice-controlled AESOP works more efficiently and faster than the hand or foot control.

Key words: gynaecological endoscopic surgery/robotic assistance


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 The International Journal of Robotics ResearchHome page
P. Berkelman and Ji Ma
A Compact Modular Teleoperated Robotic System for Laparoscopic Surgery
The International Journal of Robotics Research, September 1, 2009; 28(9): 1198 - 1215.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 SURG INNOVHome page
A. A. Gumbs, F. Crovari, C. Vidal, P. Henri, and B. Gayet
Modified Robotic Lightweight Endoscope (ViKY) Validation In Vivo in a Porcine Model
Surgical Innovation, December 1, 2007; 14(4): 261 - 264.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 SURG INNOVHome page
D. R. Ewing, A. Pigazzi, Y. Wang, and G. H. Ballantyne
Robots in the Operating Room The History
Surgical Innovation, June 1, 2004; 11(2): 63 - 71.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
M. Hashizume and K. Tsugawa
Robotic Surgery and Cancer: the Present State, Problems and Future Vision
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2004; 34(5): 227 - 237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch SurgHome page
D. Lomanto, W.-K. Cheah, J. B. So, and P. M. Goh
Robotically Assisted Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Pilot Study
Arch Surg, October 1, 2001; 136(10): 1106 - 1108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.