Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol 13, 3023-3031, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

A double-blind, randomized, dose-finding study to assess the efficacy of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist ganirelix (Org 37462) to prevent premature luteinizing hormone surges in women undergoing ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (Puregon). The ganirelix dose-finding study group


A multicentre, double-blind, randomized dose-finding study of Org 37462 (ganirelix) was conducted in 333 women undergoing ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH; Puregon) to establish the minimal effective dose preventing premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surges during ovarian stimulation. For ovarian stimulation, rFSH was given in a fixed daily dose of 150 IU for 5 days from days 2 to 6 of the menstrual cycle. From cycle day 7 onward, up to and including the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG), Org 37462 (dosages 0.0625, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 mg/0.5 ml) was administered once daily by s.c. injection, and the rFSH dose was adjusted depending on ovarian response. The lowest (0.0625 mg) and highest (2.0 mg) dose groups were terminated prematurely on the advice of an external independent advisory committee. Serum Org 37462 concentrations increased in a linear dose-proportional manner, whereas serum LH and increases of oestradiol fell with increasing Org 37462 dose. During Org 37462 treatment, serum LH concentrations > or =10 IU/l were observed in the lowest dose groups with incidences of 16% (0.0625 mg), 9% (0.125 mg) and 1.4 % (0.25 mg). On the day of HCG, the number of follicles > or =11, > or =15 and > or =17 mm were similar in the six dose groups, whereas serum oestradiol concentrations were highest in the 0.0625 mg group (1475 pg/ml) and lowest in the 2 mg group (430 pg/ml). The median daily dose of rFSH was between 150 and 183 IU and the overall median duration of Org 37462 treatment was approximately 5 days in the six treatment groups. Overall, Org 37462 treatment appeared to be safe and well tolerated. The mean number of recovered oocytes and good-quality embryos was similar in all dose groups and ranged from 8.6 to 10.0 and 2.5 to 3.8, respectively. The mean number of replaced embryos in the different dose groups ranged from 2.3 to 2.7. The implantation rate was highest in the 0.25 mg group (21.9%) and lowest in the 2 mg group (1.5%). The early miscarriage rates (first 6 weeks after embryo transfer) were 11.9 and 13% in the 1 and 2 mg group respectively, whereas in the other dose groups this incidence was zero (0.0625%) up to a maximum of 3.7% (0.5 mg group). The vital pregnancy rate (with heart activity) at 5-6 weeks after embryo transfer was highest in the 0.25 mg group, i.e. 36.8 % per attempt and 40.3 % per transfer, and resulted in an ongoing pregnancy rate 12-16 weeks after embryo transfer of 33.8% per attempt and 37.1% per transfer. In conclusion, a daily dose of 0.25 mg Org 37462 prevented LH surges during ovarian stimulation and resulted in a good clinical outcome.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
M.F.G. Verberg, M.J.C. Eijkemans, N.S. Macklon, E.M.E.W. Heijnen, E.B. Baart, F.P. Hohmann, B.C.J.M. Fauser, and F.J. Broekmans
The clinical significance of the retrieval of a low number of oocytes following mild ovarian stimulation for IVF: a meta-analysis
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2009; 15(1): 5 - 12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
C. Hayden
GnRH analogues: applications in assisted reproductive techniques
Eur. J. Endocrinol., December 1, 2008; 159(suppl_1): S17 - S25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Kol and R. Homburg
Change, change, change: hormonal actions depend on changes in blood levels
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2008; 23(5): 1004 - 1006.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J.A. Huirne, R. Homburg, and C.B. Lambalk
Are GnRH antagonists comparable to agonists for use in IVF?
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2007; 22(11): 2805 - 2813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. G. Lainas, G. K. Petsas, I. Z. Zorzovilis, G. S. Iliadis, G. T. Lainas, H. E. Cazlaris, and E. M. Kolibianakis
Initiation of GnRH antagonist on Day 1 of stimulation as compared to the long agonist protocol in PCOS patients. A randomized controlled trial: effect on hormonal levels and follicular development
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2007; 22(6): 1540 - 1546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. B. Lambalk and R. Homburg
GnRH agonist for luteal support in IVF? Setting the balance between enthusiasm and caution
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2006; 21(10): 2580 - 2582.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
B.C. Tarlatzis, B.C. Fauser, E.M. Kolibianakis, K. Diedrich, P. Devroey, and , On Behalf of the Brussels GnRH Antagonist Consen
GnRH antagonists in ovarian stimulation for IVF
Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2006; 12(4): 333 - 340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
N. S. Macklon, R. L. Stouffer, L. C. Giudice, and B. C. J. M. Fauser
The Science behind 25 Years of Ovarian Stimulation for in Vitro Fertilization
Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2006; 27(2): 170 - 207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
P. Y. Liu, S. M. Pincus, P. Y. Takahashi, P. D. Roebuck, A. Iranmanesh, D. M. Keenan, and J. D. Veldhuis
Aging attenuates both the regularity and joint synchrony of LH and testosterone secretion in normal men: analyses via a model of graded GnRH receptor blockade
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, January 1, 2006; 290(1): E34 - E41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. Rombauts, D. Healy, R. J. Norman, and on behalf of the Orgalutran Scheduling Study Group
A comparative randomized trial to assess the impact of oral contraceptive pretreatment on follicular growth and hormone profiles in GnRH antagonist-treated patients
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2006; 21(1): 95 - 103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Simon, J. Oberye, J. Bellver, C. Vidal, E. Bosch, J.A. Horcajadas, C. Murphy, S. Adams, A. Riesewijk, B. Mannaerts, et al.
Similar endometrial development in oocyte donors treated with either high- or standard-dose GnRH antagonist compared to treatment with a GnRH agonist or in natural cycles
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2005; 20(12): 3318 - 3327.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
I.E. Messinis, D. Loutradis, E. Domali, C.P. Kotsovassilis, L. Papastergiopoulou, A. Kallitsaris, P. Drakakis, K. Dafopoulos, and S. Milingos
Alternate day and daily administration of GnRH antagonist may prevent premature luteinization to a similar extent during FSH treatment
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2005; 20(11): 3192 - 3197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
P. Y. Liu, P. Y. Takahashi, P. D. Roebuck, A. Iranmanesh, and J. D. Veldhuis
Age-specific changes in the regulation of LH-dependent testosterone secretion: assessing responsiveness to varying endogenous gonadotropin output in normal men
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2005; 289(3): R721 - R728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J.-C. Arce, A. Nyboe Andersen, and J. Collins
Resolving methodological and clinical issues in the design of efficacy trials in assisted reproductive technologies: a mini-review
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2005; 20(7): 1757 - 1771.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
N. Prapas, Y. Prapas, Y. Panagiotidis, S. Prapa, P. Vanderzwalmen, R. Schoysman, and G. Makedos
GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in oocyte donation cycles: a prospective randomized study
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2005; 20(6): 1516 - 1520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. Griesinger, A. Schultze-Mosgau, K. Dafopoulos, A. Schroeder, A. Schroer, S. von Otte, D. Hornung, K. Diedrich, and R. Felberbaum
Recombinant luteinizing hormone supplementation to recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone induced ovarian hyperstimulation in the GnRH-antagonist multiple-dose protocol
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2005; 20(5): 1200 - 1206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
J. D. Veldhuis, N. J. D. Veldhuis, D. M. Keenan, and A. Iranmanesh
Age diminishes the testicular steroidogenic response to repeated intravenous pulses of recombinant human LH during acute GnRH-receptor blockade in healthy men
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, April 1, 2005; 288(4): E775 - E781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. A.F. Huirne, A. C.D. van Loenen, R. Schats, J. McDonnell, P. G.A. Hompes, J. Schoemaker, R. Homburg, and C. B. Lambalk
Dose-finding study of daily GnRH antagonist for the prevention of premature LH surges in IVF/ICSI patients: optimal changes in LH and progesterone for clinical pregnancy
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 359 - 367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. A.F. Huirne, A. C.D. van Loenen, R. Schats, J. McDonnell, P. G.A. Hompes, J. Schoemaker, R. Homburg, and C. B. Lambalk
Dose-finding study of daily gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist for the prevention of premature luteinizing hormone surges in IVF/ICSI patients: antide and hormone levels
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2004; 19(10): 2206 - 2215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
J. D. Veldhuis and A. Iranmanesh
Pulsatile Intravenous Infusion of Recombinant Human Luteinizing Hormone under Acute Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor Blockade Reconstitutes Testosterone Secretion in Young Men
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2004; 89(9): 4474 - 4479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
I. Cedrin-Durnerin, D. Grange-Dujardin, A. Laffy, I. Parneix, N. Massin, J. Galey, L. Theron, J.P. Wolf, C. Conord, P. Clement, et al.
Recombinant human LH supplementation during GnRH antagonist administration in IVF/ICSI cycles: a prospective randomized study
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2004; 19(9): 1979 - 1984.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. J. Out, A. Rutherford, R. Fleming, C. C.K. Tay, G. Trew, W. Ledger, and D. Cahill
A randomized, double-blind, multicentre clinical trial comparing starting doses of 150 and 200 IU of recombinant FSH in women treated with the GnRH antagonist ganirelix for assisted reproduction
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2004; 19(1): 90 - 95.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S.R. Lindheim and A.J. Morales
GnRH antagonists followed by a decline in serum estradiol results in adverse outcomes in donor oocyte cycles
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2003; 18(10): 2048 - 2051.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. J. Boerrigter, J. J. de Bie, B. M.J.L. Mannaerts, B. P. van Leeuwen, and D. P.J. Passier-Timmermans
Obstetrical and neonatal outcome after controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF using the GnRH antagonist ganirelix
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2002; 17(8): 2027 - 2034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. Al-Inany and M. Aboulghar
GnRH antagonist in assisted reproduction: a Cochrane review
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2002; 17(4): 874 - 885.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
B. C. Fauser, D. de Jong, F. Olivennes, H. Wramsby, C. Tay, J. Itskovitz-Eldor, and H. G. van Hooren
Endocrine Profiles after Triggering of Final Oocyte Maturation with GnRH Agonist after Cotreatment with the GnRH Antagonist Ganirelix during Ovarian Hyperstimulation for in Vitro Fertilization
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2002; 87(2): 709 - 715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. De Placido, A. Mollo, C. Alviggi, I. Strina, M. T. Varricchio, A. Ranieri, N. Colacurci, A. Tolino, and M. Wilding
Rescue of IVF cycles by HMG in pituitary down-regulated normogonadotrophic young women characterized by a poor initial response to recombinant FSH
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2001; 16(9): 1875 - 1879.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
F. Olivennes, B. Mannaerts, M. Struijs, M. Bonduelle, and P. Devroey
Perinatal outcome of pregnancy after GnRH antagonist (ganirelix) treatment during ovarian stimulation for conventional IVF or ICSI: a preliminary report
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2001; 16(8): 1588 - 1591.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
F.P. Hohmann, J.S.E. Laven, F.H. de Jong, M.J.C. Eijkemans, and B.C.J.M. Fauser
Low-dose exogenous FSH initiated during the early, mid or late follicular phase can induce multiple dominant follicle development
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2001; 16(5): 846 - 854.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
O. Ortmann, J.M. Weiss, and K. Diedrich
Embryo implantation and GnRH antagonists: Ovarian actions of GnRH antagonists
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2001; 16(4): 608 - 611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. European Middle East Orgalutran Study Group*
Comparable clinical outcome using the GnRH antagonist ganirelix or a long protocol of the GnRH agonist triptorelin for the prevention of premature LH surges in women undergoing ovarian stimulation
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2001; 16(4): 644 - 651.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Filicori, G. L. Schattman, D. Levy, and J. Navarro
LH and ovulation induction
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2001; 16(4): 803 - 804.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Filicori, G. E. Cognigni, S. Taraborrelli, D. Spettoli, W. Ciampaglia, C. Tabarelli de Fatis, P. Pocognoli, B. Cantelli, and S. Boschi
Luteinzing Hormone Activity in Menotropins Optimizes Folliculogenesis and Treatment in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2001; 86(1): 337 - 343.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D. P. Levy, J. M. Navarro, G. L. Schattman, O. K. Davis, and Z. Rosenwaks
The role of LH in ovarian stimulation: Exogenous LH: let's design the future
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2000; 15(11): 2258 - 2265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R.M.J. Janssens, C.B. Lambalk, J.P.W. Vermeiden, R. Schats, J.M. Bernards, L.T.M. Rekers-Mombarg, and J. Schoemaker
Dose-finding study of triptorelin acetate for prevention of a premature LH surge in IVF: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2000; 15(11): 2333 - 2340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Kol
Embryo implantation and GnRH antagonists: GnRH antagonists in ART: lower embryo implantation?
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2000; 15(9): 1881 - 1882.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
B. Mannaerts and K. Gordon
Embryo implantation and GnRH antagonists: GnRH antagonists do not activate the GnRH receptor
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2000; 15(9): 1882 - 1883.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Itskovitz-Eldor, S. Kol, and B. Mannaerts
Use of a single bolus of GnRH agonist triptorelin to trigger ovulation after GnRH antagonist ganirelix treatment in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction, with special reference to the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: preliminary report: Short communication
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2000; 15(9): 1965 - 1968.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
The European Orgalutran Study Group, G. Borm, and B. Mannaerts
Treatment with the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist ganirelix in women undergoing ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone is effective, safe and convenient: results of a controlled, randomized, multicentre trial
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2000; 15(7): 1490 - 1498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. R. Hernandez
Embryo implantation and GnRH antagonists: Embryo implantation: the Rubicon for GnRH antagonists
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2000; 15(6): 1211 - 1216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. G. Westergaard, S. B. Laursen, and C. Y. Andersen
Increased risk of early pregnancy loss by profound suppression of luteinizing hormone during ovarian stimulation in normogonadotrophic women undergoing assisted reproduction
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2000; 15(5): 1003 - 1008.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Albano, R.E. Felberbaum, J. Smitz, H. Riethmuller-Winzen, J. Engel, K. Diedrich, and P. Devroey
Ovarian stimulation with HMG: results of a prospective randomized phase III European study comparing the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH)-antagonist cetrorelix and the LHRH-agonist buserelin
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2000; 15(3): 526 - 531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Oberye, B. Mannaerts, J. Huisman, and C. Timmer
Local tolerance, pharmacokinetics, and dynamics of ganirelix (Orgalutran(R)) administration by Medi-Jector(R) compared to conventional needle injections
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2000; 15(2): 245 - 249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. J. Out, D. D.M. Braat, B. M.E. Lintsen, T. Gurgan, O. Bukulmez, O. Gokmen, G. Keles, P. Caballero, J. M. Gonzalez, F. Fabregues, et al.
Increasing the daily dose of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (Puregon(R)) does not compensate for the age-related decline in retrievable oocytes after ovarian stimulation
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2000; 15(1): 29 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Kol, A. Lightman, T. Hillensjo, P. Devroey, B. Fauser, B. Tarlatzis, B. Mannaerts, and J. Itskovitz-Eldor
High doses of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist in in-vitro fertilization cycles do not adversely affect the outcome of subsequent freeze–thaw cycles
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 1999; 14(9): 2242 - 2244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Filicori, G. E. Cognigni, S. Taraborrelli, D. Spettoli, W. Ciampaglia, C. Tabarelli de Fatis, and P. Pocognoli
Luteinizing Hormone Activity Supplementation Enhances Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Efficacy and Improves Ovulation Induction Outcome
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 1999; 84(8): 2659 - 2663.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
R. L. Barbieri and M. D. Hornstein
Assisted Reproduction-In Vitro Fertilization Success Is Improved by Ovarian Stimulation with Exogenous Gonadotropins and Pituitary Suppression with Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Analogues
Endocr. Rev., June 1, 1999; 20(3): 249 - 252.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. H. Balen, C. J. Hayden, and A. J. Rutherford
Clinical efficacy of recombinant gonadotrophins
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 1999; 14(6): 1411 - 1417.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E.R. Hernandez
The good, the bad and the ugly
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 1999; 14(6): 1417 - 1418.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.