Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Ziegler, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bulletti, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Ziegler, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bulletti, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol 13, 561-564, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Synchronization of endogenous and exogenous FSH stimuli in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH)

D de Ziegler, AS Jaaskelainen, PA Brioschi, R Fanchin and C Bulletti
Department of OB/GYN, Hospital of Nyon, Switzerland.

We have previously observed that exogenous oestradiol can delay the intercycle increase in plasma follicle stimulating hormone (FSH). The increase in plasma FSH that follows discontinuation of exogenous oestradiol peaks after 3 days. We have now studied the possibility of using exogenous oestradiol to synchronize the increase in endogenous FSH with the onset of human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) treatment in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). A total of 30 women aged 35.1+/-6.3 years (mean+/-SD) undergoing ovarian stimulation received 2 mg of oestradiol valerate twice daily starting on day 25 of the previous menstrual cycle until the first Tuesday following menses. Ovarian stimulation was initiated 3 days later. On the last day of oestradiol treatment, plasma oestradiol, FSH and luteinizing hormone (LH) (mean+/-SEM) were 566+/-53 (pmol/l), 3.8+/-0.4 (IU/l) and 5.5+/- 0.8 (IU/l) respectively. After 3 days, the FSH and LH (mean+/-SEM) had increased to 6.7+/-0.7 and 6.9+/-0.7 (IU/l) respectively while oestradiol decreased to 251+/-29 (pmol/l). The mean number (+/-SEM) of HMG ampoules used was 25.1+/-2.7 and treatment lasted 11.3+/-0.9 days. Five women became pregnant for a pregnancy rate (ongoing) of 19 (15)%. If all women aged >40 years (six women who did not become pregnant) were excluded from analysis the pregnancy rate (ongoing) was 24 (19%). These results indicate that exogenous oestradiol can safely be used for the synchronization of endogenous and exogenous FSH stimuli in COH. This approach provides the practical advantage of permitting an advanced timing of the onset of COH treatments when gonadotrophin- releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists are not used, which improves treatment convenience for patients and team members alike. Further development of this model may enable control of the onset of natural cycles which may find practical applications for timing assisted reproductive techniques (intrauterine insemination or in-vitro fertilization) in the natural cycle.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J.A. Huirne, R. Homburg, and C.B. Lambalk
Are GnRH antagonists comparable to agonists for use in IVF?
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2007; 22(11): 2805 - 2813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
I. Cedrin-Durnerin, B. Bstandig, I. Parneix, V. Bied-Damon, C. Avril, C. Decanter, and J.N. Hugues
Effects of oral contraceptive, synthetic progestogen or natural estrogen pre-treatments on the hormonal profile and the antral follicle cohort before GnRH antagonist protocol
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2007; 22(1): 109 - 116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J.A. Huirne, J.N. Hugues, C. Pirard, F. Fischl, J.C. Sage, J.L. Pouly, A. Obruca, D.M. Braat, A.C.D. van Loenen, and C.B. Lambalk
Cetrorelix in an oral contraceptive-pretreated stimulation cycle compared with buserelin in IVF/ICSI patients treated with r-hFSH: a randomized, multicentre, phase IIIb study
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2006; 21(6): 1408 - 1415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. M. Kolibianakis, E. G. Papanikolaou, M. Camus, H. Tournaye, A. C. Van Steirteghem, and P. Devroey
Effect of oral contraceptive pill pretreatment on ongoing pregnancy rates in patients stimulated with GnRH antagonists and recombinant FSH for IVF. A randomized controlled trial
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2006; 21(2): 352 - 357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R. Fanchin, L. Salomon, A. Castelo-Branco, F. Olivennes, N. Frydman, and R. Frydman
Luteal estradiol pre-treatment coordinates follicular growth during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with GnRH antagonists
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2003; 18(12): 2698 - 2703.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.