Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vrtacnik-Bokal, E.
Right arrow Articles by Meden-Vrtovec, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vrtacnik-Bokal, E.
Right arrow Articles by Meden-Vrtovec, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol 13, 815-821, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Utero-ovarian arterial blood flow and hormonal profile in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome

E Vrtacnik-Bokal and H Meden-Vrtovec
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Ljubljana, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Utero-ovarian arterial blood flow and hormonal profile were evaluated in 20 patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and in 22 patients with normal menstrual cycle (NMC) undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. In this controlled prospective clinical study the vascular impedance in the utero-ovarian arteries was measured in both groups on days 4, 13, 22 [introduction of gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) administration], 36 (after the 14 day GnRHa administration) and on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration. Simultaneously, serum concentrations of luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), oestradiol, androstendione and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) were determined. In the PCOS group significantly (P < 0.05) higher concentrations of FSH and LH were found on day 22, whereas the excess of androstendione production and lower SHBG values were registered throughout the studied cycles. Also, no effect of the 14 day GnRHa administration on the androstendione discharge was registered. In both groups the serum LH concentration decreased significantly (P < 0.05); however, the value remained significantly (P < 0.05) higher in the PCOS group. In the PCOS group no changes regarding the vascular impedance in the uterine artery were registered in the phase of the cycle preceding the GnRHa administration. The resistance index (RI) on day 22 of the cycle was 0.86 in the PCOS and 0.82 in the NMC group. In the NMC group the active ovary showed dramatic changes during the cycle, with vascular impedance almost constant throughout the cycle in the inactive ovary. In the PCOS group the vascular impedance to ovarian arterial blood flow in both ovaries was similar to that in inactive ovaries in the NMC group. After the 14 day GnRHa administration the utero-ovarian vascular impedance was high in both groups with changes registered only in the NMC group, as the PCOS patients exhibited maximal vascular impedance throughout the cycle. On the day of HCG administration strong negative correlation between the vascular impedance in the uterine artery and the serum oestradiol concentration in stimulated cycles was found in both groups, but not in anovulatory PCOS patients. As in PCOS patients the utero- ovarian vascular impedance was raised throughout the cycle we concluded that the 14 day GnRHa administration neither affected the utero-ovarian arterial blood flow nor suppressed the androstendione discharge.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Palomba, T. Russo, F. Orio Jr, A. Falbo, F. Manguso, T. Cascella, A. Tolino, E. Carmina, A. Colao, and F. Zullo
Uterine effects of metformin administration in anovulatory women with polycystic ovary syndrome
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2006; 21(2): 457 - 465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. V. Bokal, H. M. Vrtovec, I. V. Klun, and I. Verdenik
Prolonged HCG action affects angiogenic substances and improves follicular maturation, oocyte quality and fertilization competence in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2005; 20(6): 1562 - 1568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. H. Yu Ng, C. Chi Wai Chan, O. S. Tang, W. Shu Biu Yeung, and P. Chung Ho
Effect of pituitary downregulation on antral follicle count, ovarian volume and stromal blood flow measured by three-dimensional ultrasound with power Doppler prior to ovarian stimulation
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2004; 19(12): 2811 - 2815.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
L. Ibanez, C. Valls, S. Cabre, and F. de Zegher
Flutamide-Metformin Plus Ethinylestradiol-Drospirenone for Lipolysis and Antiatherogenesis in Young Women with Ovarian Hyperandrogenism: The Key Role of Early, Low-Dose Flutamide
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2004; 89(9): 4716 - 4720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. E. Parsanezhad, M. H. Bagheri, S. Alborzi, and E. H. Schmidt
Ovarian stromal blood flow changes after laparoscopic ovarian cauterization in women with polycystic ovary syndrome
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2003; 18(7): 1432 - 1437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. Dada, O. Salha, V. Allgar, and V. Sharma
Utero-ovarian blood flow characteristics of pituitary desensitization
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2001; 16(8): 1663 - 1670.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Cagnacci, A.M. Paoletti, S. Arangino, G.B. Melis, and A. Volpe
Effect of ovarian suppression on glucose metabolism of young lean women with and without ovarian hyperandrogenism
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 1999; 14(4): 893 - 897.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.