Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (39)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tournaye, H.
Right arrow Articles by Devroey, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tournaye, H.
Right arrow Articles by Devroey, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol 13, 901-904, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Fine needle aspiration versus open biopsy for testicular sperm recovery: a controlled study in azoospermic patients with normal spermatogenesis

H Tournaye, K Clasen, A Aytoz, Z Nagy, A Van Steirteghem and P Devroey
Centre for Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital, Dutch-speaking Brussels Free University (Vrije Universiteit Brussel), Belgium.

This retrospective controlled study aimed at comparing two techniques for recovering testicular spermatozoa in azoospermic patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). 102 men suffering from infertility because of obstructive azoospermia had ICSI using testicular spermatozoa recovered either by open excisional biopsy (n = 51), or by fine needle aspiration (FNA) (n = 51). A higher average number of spermatozoa were recovered after open biopsy than after FNA, but no significant differences in either fertilization rates or cleavage rates were observed after ICSI with spermatozoa retrieved by the two techniques. Neither was there any significant difference in ongoing pregnancy and implantation rates: in the FNA group, these figures were respectively 19.6% per cycle and 7.8% per embryo transferred and in the open biopsy group 21.6 and 7.1%. We conclude that ICSI with testicular spermatozoa recovered by FNA yields results comparable to those obtained with spermatozoa recovered by open biopsy in azoospermic patients with normal spermatogenesis. However a prospective study is needed to confirm the present results and to assess recovery rates and patient comfort for the two methods.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
N. Nikolettos, B. Asimakopoulos, and I. S. Papastefanou
Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection-An Assisted Reproduction Technique That Should Make Us Cautious About Imprinting Deregulation
Reproductive Sciences, July 1, 2006; 13(5): 317 - 328.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. M. Rossi, L. A.V. Pereira, L. de Santis, F. F. Pasqualotto, A. Iaconelli Jr, V. Ortiz, and E. Borges Jr
Sperm retrieval techniques in rats with suppressed spermatogenesis by experimental cryptorchidism
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 443 - 447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J.D.M. Nicopoullos, C. Gilling-Smith, P.A. Almeida, and J.W.A. Ramsay
The results of 154 ICSI cycles using surgically retrieved sperm from azoospermic men
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2004; 19(3): 579 - 585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
P. Devroey and A. Van Steirteghem
A review of ten years experience of ICSI
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2004; 10(1): 19 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
S. Wood, E. Vang, J. Manning, J. Walton, S. Troup, C. Kingsland, and I. D. Lewis-Jones
The Ratio of Second to Fourth Digit Length in Azoospermic Males Undergoing Surgical Sperm Retrieval: Predictive Value for Sperm Retrieval and on Subsequent Fertilization and Pregnancy Rates in IVF/ICSI Cycles
J Androl, November 1, 2003; 24(6): 871 - 877.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
Y. Shufaro, D. Prus, N. Laufer, and A. Simon
Impact of repeated testicular fine needle aspirations (TEFNA) and testicular sperm extraction (TESE) on the microscopic morphology of the testis: an animal model
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2002; 17(7): 1795 - 1799.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
P. N. Kolettis
The Evaluation and Management of the Azoospermic Patient
J Androl, May 1, 2002; 23(3): 293 - 305.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
V. Abdelmassih, J. P. Balmaceda, J. Tesarik, R. Abdelmassih, and Z. P. Nagy
Relationship between time period after vasectomy and the reproductive capacity of sperm obtained by epididymal aspiration
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2002; 17(3): 736 - 740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R. Mercan, B. Urman, C. Alatas, S. Aksoy, A. Nuhoglu, A. Isiklar, and B. Balaban
Outcome of testicular sperm retrieval procedures in non-obstructive azoospermia: percutaneous aspiration versus open biopsy
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2000; 15(7): 1548 - 1551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
F. Ubaldi, Z. P. Nagy, L. Rienzi, J. Tesarik, R. Anniballo, G. Franco, F. Menchini-Fabris, and E. Greco
Reproductive capacity of spermatozoa from men with testicular failure
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 1999; 14(11): 2796 - 2800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Lewin, B. Reubinoff, A. Porat-Katz, D. Weiss, V. Eisenberg, R. Arbel, H. Bar-el, and A. Safran
Testicular fine needle aspiration: the alternative method for sperm retrieval in non-obstructive azoospermia
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 1999; 14(7): 1785 - 1790.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. Gianaroli, M.C. Magli, H.A. Selman, G. Colpi, E. Belgrano, C. Trombetta, G. Vitali, and A.P. Ferraretti
Diagnostic testicular biopsy and cryopreservation of testicular tissue as an alternative to repeated surgical openings in the treatment of azoospermic men
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 1999; 14(4): 1034 - 1038.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.