Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (37)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pelinck, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Dhont, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pelinck, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Dhont, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol 13, 960-963, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Embryos cultured in vitro with multinucleated blastomeres have poor implantation potential in human in-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection

MJ Pelinck, M De Vos, M Dekens, J Van der Elst, P De Sutter and M Dhont
Infertility Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.

The aim of the present study was to investigate pregnancy rates ensuing from transfer of embryos with multinucleated blastomeres. In our in- vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) programme, 1735 embryo transfers were performed from January 1, 1995 to August 31, 1996. In 136 of these transfers at least one embryo with one or more multinucleated blastomeres was present per transfer (study group). For each of these 136 transfers, two matched controls with transfer of exclusively mononucleated embryos were selected (control group). Matching was carried out according to age, method of fertilization (IVF or ICSI), number of transferred embryos and quality score of transferred embryos. In the study group, there were eight transfers of exclusively multinucleated embryos from which one pregnancy ensued and 128 transfers in which multinucleated and mononucleated embryos were transferred together leading to 23 pregnancies. The overall clinical pregnancy rate per transfer was 16.9% in the study group versus 28.7% in the control group (P = 0.01). The ongoing pregnancy rate per transfer was 13.2% in the study group versus 23.2% in the control group (P = 0.03). The implantation rate per transferred embryo was 6.0% in the study group versus 11.3% in the control group (P = 0.003). This study shows that embryos with one or more multinucleated blastomeres have a poorer implantation potential than embryos with mononucleated blastomeres. Transfer of embryos with multinucleated blastomeres should hence only be considered when insufficient numbers of embryos with only mononucleated blastomeres are present.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Ziebe, K. Lundin, R. Janssens, L. Helmgaard, J.-C. Arce, and for the MERIT (Menotrophin vs Recombinant FSH in v
Influence of ovarian stimulation with HP-hMG or recombinant FSH on embryo quality parameters in patients undergoing IVF
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2007; 22(9): 2404 - 2413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. Scott, A. Finn, T. O'Leary, S. McLellan, and J. Hill
Morphologic parameters of early cleavage-stage embryos that correlate with fetal development and delivery: prospective and applied data for increased pregnancy rates
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2007; 22(1): 230 - 240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Thurin, T. Hardarson, J. Hausken, B. Jablonowska, K. Lundin, A. Pinborg, and C. Bergh
Predictors of ongoing implantation in IVF in a good prognosis group of patients
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2005; 20(7): 1876 - 1880.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
J. M.R. Gerris
Single embryo transfer and IVF/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal
Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2005; 11(2): 105 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Hnida, I. Agerholm, and S. Ziebe
Traditional detection versus computer-controlled multilevel analysis of nuclear structures from donated human embryos
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2005; 20(3): 665 - 671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Hnida, E. Engenheiro, and S. Ziebe
Computer-controlled, multilevel, morphometric analysis of blastomere size as biomarker of fragmentation and multinuclearity in human embryos
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2004; 19(2): 288 - 293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. V. Royen, K. Mangelschots, M. Vercruyssen, D. D. Neubourg, M. Valkenburg, G. Ryckaert, and J. Gerris
Multinucleation in cleavage stage embryos
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2003; 18(5): 1062 - 1069.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Salumets, C. Hyden-Granskog, S. Makinen, A.-M. Suikkari, A. Tiitinen, and T. Tuuri
Early cleavage predicts the viability of human embryos in elective single embryo transfer procedures
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2003; 18(4): 821 - 825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D.D. Neubourg, K. Mangelschots, E. Van Royen, M. Vercruyssen, G. Ryckaert, M. Valkenburg, J. Barudy-Vasquez, and J. Gerris
Impact of patients' choice for single embryo transfer of a top quality embryo versus double embryo transfer in the first IVF/ICSI cycle
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2002; 17(10): 2621 - 2625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K. Lundin, C. Bergh, and T. Hardarson
Early embryo cleavage is a strong indicator of embryo quality in human IVF
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2001; 16(12): 2652 - 2657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Salumets, C. Hyden-Granskog, A.-M. Suikkari, A. Tiitinen, and T. Tuuri
The predictive value of pronuclear morphology of zygotes in the assessment of human embryo quality
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2001; 16(10): 2177 - 2181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Tiitinen, M. Halttunen, P. Harkki, P. Vuoristo, and C. Hyden-Granskog
Elective single embryo transfer: the value of cryopreservation
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2001; 16(6): 1140 - 1144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. Hardarson, C. Hanson, A. Sjogren, and K. Lundin
Human embryos with unevenly sized blastomeres have lower pregnancy and implantation rates: indications for aneuploidy and multinucleation
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2001; 16(2): 313 - 318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. Van Royen, K. Mangelschots, D. De Neubourg, I. Laureys, G. Ryckaert, and J. Gerris
Calculating the implantation potential of day 3 embryos in women younger than 38 years of age: a new model
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2001; 16(2): 326 - 332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Alikani, G. Calderon, G. Tomkin, J. Garrisi, M. Kokot, and J. Cohen
Cleavage anomalies in early human embryos and survival after prolonged culture in-vitro
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2000; 15(12): 2634 - 2643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Gerris and E. Van Royen
Avoiding multiple pregnancies in ART: A plea for single embryo transfer
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2000; 15(9): 1884 - 1888.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. Van Royen, K. Mangelschots, D. De Neubourg, M. Valkenburg, M. Van de Meerssche, G. Ryckaert, W. Eestermans, and J. Gerris
Characterization of a top quality embryo, a step towards single-embryo transfer
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 1999; 14(9): 2345 - 2349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.