Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (29)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Evers, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Dunselman, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Evers, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Dunselman, G. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol 13, 1206-1209, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Treatment-independent pregnancy rate in patients with severe reproductive disorders

JL Evers, HW de Haas, JA Land, JC Dumoulin and GA Dunselman
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academisch Ziekenhuis Maastricht and The University of Maastricht, The Netherlands.

A long waiting list for in-vitro fertilization (IVF) offers the possibility to study treatment-independent pregnancy rates in patients with severe reproductive disorders. We performed a retrospective cohort study with a nested case-control design in which the cases achieved a spontaneous pregnancy while on the waiting list for IVF, or for IVF with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), and the controls did not become pregnant while on the waiting list. Spontaneous pregnancies occurred in 76 of 1391 patients on the waiting list. Significant differences between pregnant and non-pregnant patients were found for duration of subfertility (couples on the IVF waiting list), and for progressive sperm motility and basal 17beta-oestradiol (couples on the ICSI waiting list). The 12 months cumulative pregnancy rate for patients on the waiting list was 2.4% (95% CI 1.2-3.9%) for tubal subfertility patients, 5.9 % (3.7-8.7%) for longstanding unexplained subfertility patients, and 6.6% (4.5-9.3%) for male subfertility patients. Of the 76 control patients, 21% of tubal subfertility patients, 18% of unexplained subfertility patients, and 17% of male subfertility patients achieved a pregnancy in their first IVF or ICSI treatment cycle. We confirm that the treatment-independent pregnancy rate in patients with severe reproductive disorders is low. More than 75% of the spontaneous pregnancies in the tubal subfertility and unexplained subfertility couples occurred during their first three months on the waiting list, whereas spontaneous pregnancy rate in male subfertility couples showed a more gradual but persisting increase. We conclude that one cycle of IVF or ICSI is superior to 12 months of expectant management in patients with severely impaired fertility due to tubal, unexplained or male factors.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Brandes, J.O.M. van der Steen, S.B. Bokdam, C.J.C.M. Hamilton, J.P. de Bruin, W.L.D.M. Nelen, and J.A.M. Kremer
When and why do subfertile couples discontinue their fertility care? A longitudinal cohort study in a secondary care subfertility population
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2009; 24(12): 3127 - 3135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Brandes, C.J.C.M. Hamilton, J.P. de Bruin, W.L.D.M. Nelen, and J.A.M. Kremer
The relative contribution of IVF to the total ongoing pregnancy rate in a subfertile cohort
Hum. Reprod., October 24, 2009; (2009) dep341v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Pinborg, C.O. Hougaard, A. Nyboe Andersen, D. Molbo, and L. Schmidt
Prospective longitudinal cohort study on cumulative 5-year delivery and adoption rates among 1338 couples initiating infertility treatment
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2009; 24(4): 991 - 999.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Hoorens, F. Gallo, J. Cave, and J. Grant
Reply: Can assisted reproductive technologies help offset population ageing?
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2008; 23(9): 2174 - 2175.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M.J.C. Eijkemans, A.M.E. Lintsen, C.C. Hunault, C.A.M. Bouwmans, L. Hakkaart, D.D.M. Braat, and J.D.F. Habbema
Pregnancy chances on an IVF/ICSI waiting list: a national prospective cohort study
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2008; 23(7): 1627 - 1632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Hoorens, F. Gallo, J.A.K. Cave, and J.C. Grant
Can assisted reproductive technologies help to offset population ageing? An assessment of the demographic and economic impact of ART in Denmark and UK
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2007; 22(9): 2471 - 2475.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
B. J. Van Voorhis
In Vitro Fertilization
N. Engl. J. Med., January 25, 2007; 356(4): 379 - 386.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Gnoth, E. Godehardt, P. Frank-Herrmann, K. Friol, J. Tigges, and G. Freundl
Definition and prevalence of subfertility and infertility
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2005; 20(5): 1144 - 1147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Gnoth
Treatment strategies for subfertile couples: Reply
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2004; 19(7): 1678 - 1679.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E.G. Hughes, M.L. Beecroft, V. Wilkie, L. Burville, P. Claman, I. Tummon, E. Greenblatt, M. Fluker, and K. Thorpe
A multicentre randomized controlled trial of expectant management versus IVF in women with Fallopian tube patency
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2004; 19(5): 1105 - 1109.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Gnoth, D. Godehardt, E. Godehardt, P. Frank-Herrmann, and G. Freundl
Time to pregnancy: results of the German prospective study and impact on the management of infertility
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2003; 18(9): 1959 - 1966.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Almagor, M. Dan-Goor, Y. Hovav, and H. Yaffe
Spontaneous pregnancies in severe oligoasthenozoospermia
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2001; 16(8): 1780 - 1781.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K. Osmanagaoglu, H. Tournaye, M. Camus, M. Vandervorst, A. Van Steirteghem, and P. Devroey
Cumulative delivery rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection: 5 year follow-up of 498 patients
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 1999; 14(10): 2651 - 2655.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C.M. Farquhar, A. Prentice, D.H. Barlow, J.L.H. Evers, P. Vandekerckhove, and A. Vail
Effective treatment of subfertility: introducing the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 1999; 14(7): 1678 - 1683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.