Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, G. N.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, H. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, G. N.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, H. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol 13, 1255-1259, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Quantitative sperm mucus penetration: modified formulae for calculating penetration efficiency

GN Clarke, C Garrett and HW Baker
Andrology Unit, The Royal Women's Hospital, Carlton, Australia.

In 1980 Katz et al. derived a formula for the percentage of successful collisions (PSC) as a quantitative measure of sperm-cervical mucus penetration efficiency. The use of PSC waned after its validity was questioned by reports of values >100% and the observation that PSC varied with the cross-sectional area of the mucus column. The aim of the present study was to develop a more accurate measure of mucus penetration efficiency by correcting the original formula for the effects of sperm depletion in the semen reservoir. Two formulae were derived using different models for the sperm-mucus interaction: (i) each motile spermatozoon was assumed to have an equal chance of mucus penetration on collision; (ii) a select subpopulation of spermatozoa was assumed to penetrate with 100% efficiency on collision. Both modified formulae gave PSC values higher than the original estimates. Under the experimental conditions employed in this work, where large capillaries were used, the depletion corrections ranged from 4 to 46% (n=8, mean 20%) for model (i) and from 190 to 320% (n=8, mean 250%) for model (ii). The invariance of PSC (ii) results with respect to capillary cross-sectional area (1.52 mm2, 31.1%; 5.4 mm2, 28.2%) suggests that the assumptions of model (ii) provide the more accurate description of the sperm-mucus interaction.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D.Y. Liu, C. Garrett, and H.W.G. Baker
Low proportions of sperm can bind to the zona pellucida of human oocytes
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2003; 18(11): 2382 - 2389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Tang, C. Garrett, and H.W.G. Baker
Comparison of human cervical mucus and artificial sperm penetration media
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 1999; 14(11): 2812 - 2817.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.