Human Reproduction, Vol 13, 1255-1259, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press
GN Clarke, C Garrett and HW Baker
In 1980 Katz et al. derived a formula for the percentage of successful
collisions (PSC) as a quantitative measure of sperm-cervical mucus
penetration efficiency. The use of PSC waned after its validity was
questioned by reports of values >100% and the observation that PSC
varied with the cross-sectional area of the mucus column. The aim of the
present study was to develop a more accurate measure of mucus penetration
efficiency by correcting the original formula for the effects of sperm
depletion in the semen reservoir. Two formulae were derived using different
models for the sperm-mucus interaction: (i) each motile spermatozoon was
assumed to have an equal chance of mucus penetration on collision; (ii) a
select subpopulation of spermatozoa was assumed to penetrate with 100%
efficiency on collision. Both modified formulae gave PSC values higher than
the original estimates. Under the experimental conditions employed in this
work, where large capillaries were used, the depletion corrections ranged
from 4 to 46% (n=8, mean 20%) for model (i) and from 190 to 320% (n=8, mean
250%) for model (ii). The invariance of PSC (ii) results with respect to
capillary cross-sectional area (1.52 mm2, 31.1%; 5.4 mm2, 28.2%) suggests
that the assumptions of model (ii) provide the more accurate description of
the sperm-mucus interaction.
ARTICLES
Quantitative sperm mucus penetration: modified formulae for calculating penetration efficiency
Andrology Unit, The Royal Women's Hospital, Carlton, Australia.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D.Y. Liu, C. Garrett, and H.W.G. Baker Low proportions of sperm can bind to the zona pellucida of human oocytes Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2003; 18(11): 2382 - 2389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Tang, C. Garrett, and H.W.G. Baker Comparison of human cervical mucus and artificial sperm penetration media Hum. Reprod., November 1, 1999; 14(11): 2812 - 2817. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
