Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Souter, V. L.
Right arrow Articles by Templeton, A. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Souter, V. L.
Right arrow Articles by Templeton, A. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol 13, 1831-1836, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Patient satisfaction with the management of infertility

VL Souter, G Penney, JL Hopton and AA Templeton
Gynaecology Audit Project in Scotland, Aberdeen, UK.

The objective of this study was to assess patient satisfaction with the investigation and initial management of infertility. A postal questionnaire survey was carried out of 1366 women attending outpatient clinics for the investigation and initial management of infertility at 12 hospitals throughout Scotland. The response rate to the questionnaire was 59% (806/1366). Overall, 87% of responders were satisfied or very satisfied with their care but a number of deficiencies were identified. Thirty-nine per cent had never been asked to bring their partner to the clinic and 86% felt they had not been given enough help with the emotional aspects of infertility. Forty- seven per cent felt they were not given a clear plan for the future and 23% of those who had been given drug treatments reported receiving little or no information about the treatment or possible side-effects. Overall, only a third had been given any written information and 78% expressed a wish for more written information. Women ranked 'the information and explanation given' and the 'attitude of the doctor at the clinic' highly in comparison to other aspects of their care, including 'help with the emotional aspects of infertility'. In general women were satisfied with their care but improvements may be made by giving more explanation and written information and by adopting a more couple-centred approach. Where resources allow, clinics should take steps to address the emotional aspects of infertility.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S.M. Mourad, W.L.D.M. Nelen, R.P.M.G. Hermens, L.F. Bancsi, D.D.M. Braat, G.A. Zielhuis, R.P.T.M. Grol, and J.A.M. Kremer
Variation in subfertility care measured by guideline-based performance indicators
Hum. Reprod., July 24, 2008; (2008) den281v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
O. B.A. van den Akker
Psychosocial aspects of surrogate motherhood
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2007; 13(1): 53 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
O. van den Akker
A review of family donor constructs: Current research and future directions
Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2006; 12(2): 91 - 101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G.M.D. Lemmens, M. Vervaeke, P. Enzlin, E. Bakelants, D. Vanderschueren, T. D'Hooghe, and K. Demyttenaere
Coping with infertility: a body-mind group intervention programme for infertile couples
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2004; 19(8): 1917 - 1923.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. Schmidt, B.E. Holstein, J. Boivin, T. Tjornhoj-Thomsen, J. Blaabjerg, F. Hald, P.E. Rasmussen, and A. Nyboe Andersen
High ratings of satisfaction with fertility treatment are common: findings from the Copenhagen Multi-centre Psychosocial Infertility (COMPI) Research Programme
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2003; 18(12): 2638 - 2646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. Schmidt, B.E. Holstein, J. Boivin, H. Sangren, T. Tjornhoj-Thomsen, J. Blaabjerg, F. Hald, A.N. Andersen, and P.E. Rasmussen
Patients' attitudes to medical and psychosocial aspects of care in fertility clinics: findings from the Copenhagen Multi-centre Psychosocial Infertility (COMPI) Research Programme
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2003; 18(3): 628 - 637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. M. Alper, P. R. Brinsden, R. Fischer, and M. Wikland
Is your IVF programme good?
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2002; 17(1): 8 - 10.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Hojgaard, H. J. Ingerslev, and J. Dinesen
Friendly IVF: patient opinions
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2001; 16(7): 1391 - 1396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Boivin, L.C. Scanlan, and S.M. Walker
Why are infertile patients not using psychosocial counselling?
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 1999; 14(5): 1384 - 1391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.