Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gunning, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gunning, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 13, No. suppl_2, pp. 98-102, 1998
© 1998 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Oocyte donation: the legislative framework in Western Europe

Jennifer Gunning

Cardiff Law School, Museum Avenue Cardiff CF1 1XD, Wales, UK

Relatively few countries have legislation addressing oocyte donation. Where such legislation does exist it is entirely in the context of broader legislation concerned with the regulation of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or assisted reproduction more generally. Within Western Europe only nine countries so far have passed Acts addressing assisted reproduction. These countries fall into two groups in their approach to oocyte donation: those which do not allow gamete donation, and hence oocyte donation, in the context of IVF (Austria, Germany, Norway and Sweden) and those which specifically permit the use of donor oocytes in the treatment of infertility or to avoid the transmission of disease (Denmark, France, Spain and the UK). In Switzerland, a federation of cantons, where legislation relating to assisted reproduction is primarily cantonal matter, except where it affects constitutional rights, the picture is similar. The Canton of Aargau does not allow gamete donation in the context of IVF, the Cantons of Glarus and Basel do not permit gamete donation at all and the remaining cantons follow the guidelines of the Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences.

Key words: donation/gamete/legislation/oocyte/regulation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
X.Y. Cai, G.A. Chen, Y. Lian, X.Y. Zheng, and H.M. Peng
Cryoloop vitrification of rabbit oocytes
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2005; 20(7): 1969 - 1974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K. Oktay and M. Sonmezer
Ovarian tissue banking for cancer patients: Fertility preservation, not just ovarian cryopreservation
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2004; 19(3): 477 - 480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. Rienzi, F. Martinez, F. Ubaldi, M.G. Minasi, M. Iacobelli, J. Tesarik, and E. Greco
Polscope analysis of meiotic spindle changes in living metaphase II human oocytes during the freezing and thawing procedures
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2004; 19(3): 655 - 659.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
I. Boiso, M. Marti, J. Santalo, M. Ponsa, P. N. Barri, and A. Veiga
A confocal microscopy analysis of the spindle and chromosome configurations of human oocytes cryopreserved at the germinal vesicle and metaphase II stage
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2002; 17(7): 1885 - 1891.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
I. Faerge, B. Terry, J. Kalous, P. Wahl, M. Lessl, J.L. Ottesen, P. Hyttel, and C. Grondahl
Resumption of Meiosis Induced by Meiosis-Activating Sterol Has a Different Signal Transduction Pathway than Spontaneous Resumption of Meiosis in Denuded Mouse Oocytes Cultured In Vitro
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2001; 65(6): 1751 - 1758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. Frith
Gamete donation and anonymity: The ethical and legal debate
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2001; 16(5): 818 - 824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R. Fabbri, E. Porcu, T. Marsella, G. Rocchetta, S. Venturoli, and C. Flamigni
Human oocyte cryopreservation: new perspectives regarding oocyte survival
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2001; 16(3): 411 - 416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
S. M. Downs, B. Ruan, and G. J. Schroepfer Jr
Meiosis-Activating Sterol and the Maturation of Isolated Mouse Oocytes
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2001; 64(1): 80 - 89.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Emiliani, M. Van den Bergh, A.-S. Vannin, J. Biramane, and Y. Englert
Comparison of ethylene glycol, 1,2-propanediol and glycerol for cryopreservation of slow-cooled mouse zygotes, 4-cell embryos and blastocysts
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2000; 15(4): 905 - 910.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Marina, R. Exposito, F. Marina, J. Nadal, M. Masramon, and A. Verges
Oocyte donor selection from 554 candidates
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 1999; 14(11): 2770 - 2776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
C. Hegele-Hartung, J. Kuhnke, M. Lessl, C. Grøndahl, J. Ottesen, H. M. Beier, S. Eisner, and U. Eichenlaub-Ritter
Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Maturation of Mouse Oocytes After Treatment with Synthetic Meiosis-Activating Sterol In Vitro
Biol Reprod, November 1, 1999; 61(5): 1362 - 1372.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.