Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Westlander, G.
Right arrow Articles by Bergh, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Westlander, G.
Right arrow Articles by Bergh, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 14, No. 1, 118-122, January 1999
© 1999 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Diagnostic epididymal and testicular sperm recovery and genetic aspects in azoospermic men

Göran Westlander1, Lars Hamberger, Charles Hanson, Kersti Lundin, Lars Nilsson, Brita Söderlund, Charlotte Werner and Christina Bergh

Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg University, S-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden

Various procedures for sperm recovery in azoospermic men have been described, from open testicular biopsy to simple needle aspiration from the epididymis and the testis. Fifty-one obstructive and 86 non-obstructive azoospermic men were treated to compare the recovery of spermatozoa obtained by percutaneous aspiration from the epididymis (PESA) and aspiration/extraction from the testis (TESA, TESE) with histopathology. If TESA failed, the work up proceeded with TESE. All patients were karyotyped. Spermatozoa were recovered by PESA or TESA in all obstructive men (51/51 patients). In 22 out of 86 patients with non-obstructive azoospermia, testicular spermatozoa could be successfully recovered by TESA. In five additional patients TESE was successful in recovering spermatozoa where TESA had failed. In 43 patients, neither TESA nor TESE was successful. Sixteen patients chose not to proceed with TESE. Seven out of 86 patients had an abnormal karyotype in the non-obstructive group (8%), none in the obstructive group. In the non-obstructive patient group testicular histopathology showed hypospermatogenesis, incomplete maturation arrest and germ cell aplasia with focal spermatogenesis in cases where spermatozoa were recovered and complete germ cell aplasia, complete maturation arrest and fibrosis in cases where no spermatozoa were found. Spermatozoa were recovered by PESA or TESA from all patients with obstructive azoospermia and from ~40% of patients with non-obstructive azoospermia by TESA or TESE. Retrieval of viable spermatozoa in the infertility work-up was highly predictable for sperm recovery in subsequent ICSI cycles. TESA performed under local anaesthesia seems almost as effective as more invasive procedures in recovering testicular spermatozoa, both in obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermic men.

Key words: azoospermia/epididymal sperm aspiration/male infertility/testicular sperm aspiration/testicular sperm extraction

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
E. Dube, L. Hermo, P. T.K Chan, and D. G Cyr
Alterations in Gene Expression in the Caput Epididymides of Nonobstructive Azoospermic Men
Biol Reprod, February 1, 2008; 78(2): 342 - 351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
P. Donoso, H. Tournaye, and P. Devroey
Which is the best sperm retrieval technique for non-obstructive azoospermia? A systematic review
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2007; 13(6): 539 - 549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. Westlander, M. Barry, O. Petrucco, and R. Norman
Different fertilization rates between immotile testicular spermatozoa and immotile ejaculated spermatozoa for ICSI in men with Kartagener's syndrome: case reports
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2003; 18(6): 1286 - 1288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Friedler, A. Raziel, M. Schachter, D. Strassburger, O. Bern, and R. Ron-El
Outcome of first and repeated testicular sperm extraction and ICSI in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2002; 17(9): 2356 - 2361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Sousa, N. Cremades, J. Silva, C. Oliveira, L. Ferraz, J.T. da Silva, P. Viana, and A. Barros
Predictive value of testicular histology in secretory azoospermic subgroups and clinical outcome after microinjection of fresh and frozen-thawed sperm and spermatids
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2002; 17(7): 1800 - 1810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
P. N. Kolettis
The Evaluation and Management of the Azoospermic Patient
J Androl, May 1, 2002; 23(3): 293 - 305.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. Westlander, E. Ekerhovd, S. Granberg, N. Lycke, L. Nilsson, C. Werner, and C. Bergh
Serial ultrasonography, hormonal profile and antisperm antibody response after testicular sperm aspiration
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2001; 16(12): 2621 - 2627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
I. De Croo, J. Van der Elst, K. Everaert, P. De Sutter, and M. Dhont
Fertilization, pregnancy and embryo implantation rates after ICSI in cases of obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2000; 15(6): 1383 - 1388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
U.-B. Wennerholm, C. Bergh, L. Hamberger, G. Westlander, M. Wikland, and M. Wood
Obstetric outcome of pregnancies following ICSI, classified according to sperm origin and quality
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2000; 15(5): 1189 - 1194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.