Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van der Auwera, I.
Right arrow Articles by Koninckx, P.R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van der Auwera, I.
Right arrow Articles by Koninckx, P.R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 14, No. 10, 2570-2574, October 1999
© 1999 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

The influence of in-vitro culture versus stimulated and untreated oviductal environment on mouse embryo development and implantation

I. Van der Auwera1,4, R. Pijnenborg2 and P.R. Koninckx3

1 Leuven University Fertility Center, 2 Experimental Laboratory of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and 3 Division of Endoscopic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Catholic University Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium

A prospective randomised study was performed to evaluate stimulated versus natural oviductal environment in comparison with in-vitro culture for the developmental capacity of mouse embryos. Therefore, embryos of superovulated F1 hybrid CBAxC57Bl females were collected at 17, 22, 41 and 46 h after human chorionic gonadotrophin treatment and randomly divided into five groups. They were either transferred immediately to untreated pseudopregnant females, cultured in vitro for 5, 24 or 29 h before transfer, or cultured in vitro for 96 h to blastocysts. The transfers resulted in an impaired implantation (P < 0.001) and a lower numbers of living fetuses (P < 0.001) when embryos had been exposed longer to the stimulated oviductal environment. Similar results were obtained after a longer period of in-vitro culture (P < 0.05). However when embryos were flushed earlier from the superovulated mice and cultured longer in-vitro until the transfer was performed, the implantation rate was improved (P < 0.01). Blastocyst development, however, was better (P < 0.001) when embryos were flushed later. In conclusion, the stimulated oviductal environment impairs the developmental capacity of embryos in comparison with untreated pseudopregnant females. In-vitro culture is also suboptimal but better than the stimulated oviductal environment.

Key words: implantation/in-vitro culture/mouse embryo development/natural cycle/superovulation

4 To whom correspondence should be addressed


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
F. Guerif, M. Lemseffer, R. Bidault, O. Gasnier, M.H. Saussereau, V. Cadoret, C. Jamet, and D. Royere
Single Day 2 embryo versus blastocyst-stage transfer: a prospective study integrating fresh and frozen embryo transfers
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2009; 24(5): 1051 - 1058.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
M. Perez-Crespo, P. Moreira, B. Pintado, and A. Gutierrez-Adan
Factors From Damaged Sperm Affect Its DNA Integrity and Its Ability to Promote Embryo Implantation in Mice
J Androl, January 1, 2008; 29(1): 47 - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. L. Kelley, K. L. Kind, M. Lane, R. L. Robker, J. G. Thompson, and L. J. Edwards
Recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone alters maternal ovarian hormone concentrations and the uterus and perturbs fetal development in mice
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, October 1, 2006; 291(4): E761 - E770.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
S Tielens, B Verhasselt, J Liu, M Dhont, J Van Der Elst, and M Cornelissen
Generation of embryonic stem cell lines from mouse blastocysts developed in vivo and in vitro: relation to Oct-4 expression
Reproduction, July 1, 2006; 132(1): 59 - 66.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R.M. Sibug, J. de Koning, A.M.I. Tijssen, M.C. de Ruiter, E.R. de Kloet, and F.M. Helmerhorst
Urinary gonadotrophins but not recombinant gonadotrophins reduce expression of VEGF120 and its receptors flt-1 and flk-1 in the mouse uterus during the peri-implantation period
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2005; 20(3): 649 - 656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
D. Zudova, A. J. Wyrobek, J. Bishop, and F. Marchetti
Impaired fertility in T-stock female mice after superovulation
Reproduction, November 1, 2004; 128(5): 573 - 581.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
T. P. Fleming, W. Y. Kwong, R. Porter, E. Ursell, I. Fesenko, A. Wilkins, D. J. Miller, A. J. Watkins, and J. J. Eckert
The Embryo and Its Future
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2004; 71(4): 1046 - 1054.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
M. F. M. Mitwally and R. F. Casper
Aromatase Inhibition Reduces the Dose of Gonadotropin Required for Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation
Reproductive Sciences, September 1, 2004; 11(6): 406 - 415.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M.F.M. Mitwally and R.F. Casper
Aromatase inhibition reduces gonadotrophin dose required for controlled ovarian stimulation in women with unexplained infertility
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2003; 18(8): 1588 - 1597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R.M. Sibug, F.M. Helmerhorst, A.M.I. Tijssen, E.R. de Kloet, and J. de Koning
Gonadotrophin stimulation reduces VEGF120 expression in the mouse uterus during the peri-implantation period
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2002; 17(6): 1643 - 1648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
I. Van der Auwera and T. D'Hooghe
Superovulation of female mice delays embryonic and fetal development
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2001; 16(6): 1237 - 1243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. Ertzeid and R. Storeng
The impact of ovarian stimulation on implantation and fetal development in mice
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2001; 16(2): 221 - 225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. Liu, J. Van der Elst, R. Van den Broecke, and M. Dhont
Live Offspring by In Vitro Fertilization of Oocytes from Cryopreserved Primordial Mouse Follicles after Sequential In Vivo Transplantation and In Vitro Maturation
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2001; 64(1): 171 - 178.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.