Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bachtell, N.E.
Right arrow Articles by Turek, P.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bachtell, N.E.
Right arrow Articles by Turek, P.J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 14, No. 12, 3048-3051, December 1999
© 1999 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

The relative viability of human spermatozoa from the vas deferens, epididymis and testis before and after cryopreservation

N.E. Bachtell1, J. Conaghan2 and P.J. Turek1,3

1 Department of Urology and 2 Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, School of Medicine, 2330 Post Street, 6th Floor, San Francisco, California 94115–1695, USA

Testicular and epididymal spermatozoa are routinely used with in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) to achieve pregnancies. In addition, excess cryopreserved spermatozoa can be thawed and used for ICSI. However, information on the recovery of epididymal and testicular spermatozoa after freeze–thaw is lacking. This is important to determine the feasibility of using previously cryopreserved aspirated spermatozoa for ICSI. We prospectively compared the viability of fresh and frozen–thawed spermatozoa from the vas deferens, epididymis and testicle by several measures. Testis spermatozoa were obtained from men with non-obstructive azoospermia (n = 5), epididymal spermatozoa from men with obstructive azoospermia (n = 8), and vasal spermatozoa from fertile men by vasal irrigation at vasectomy (n = 5). The viability of fresh spermatozoa was assessed by motility, two vital stains (carboxyfluorescein, 0.08 mg/ml and propidium iodide, 20 mg/ml) and the hypo-osmotic swelling assay (HOS; 100 mmol/l citrate and fructose). After cryopreservation, spermatozoa were thawed and all viability measures repeated. Although fresh vasal spermatozoa were the most motile, testicular spermatozoa exhibited similar, high viability (91 and 86% respectively) by vital stain. Spermatozoa from testis, epididymis and vas deferens survived cryopreservation equally well by vital stain, but not by motility. As a selection measure, the HOS assay identified significantly more viable epididymal and testicular spermatozoa than did motility in both fresh and frozen–thawed populations. It appears feasible to use frozen–thawed extracted spermatozoa for ICSI when motility and a selection measure such as the HOS assay are used. With fresh testis spermatozoa, selection methods may not be necessary prior to ICSI, as cell viability is high.

Key words: cryopreservation/epididymis/hypo-osmotic swelling/sperm viability/testis

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. N. Sallam, A. Farrag, A.-F. Agameya, Y. El-Garem, and F. Ezzeldin
The use of the modified hypo-osmotic swelling test for the selection of immotile testicular spermatozoa in patients treated with ICSI: a randomized controlled study
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2005; 20(12): 3435 - 3440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Friedler, A. Raziel, D. Strassburger, M. Schachter, Y. Soffer, and R. Ron-El
Factors influencing the outcome of ICSI in patients with obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia: a comparative study
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2002; 17(12): 3114 - 3121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
O. Khorram, P. Patrizio, C. Wang, and R. Swerdloff
Reproductive Technologies for Male Infertility
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2001; 86(6): 2373 - 2379.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Cayan, D. Lee, J. Conaghan, C. A. Givens, I. P. Ryan, E. D. Schriock, and P. J. Turek
A comparison of ICSI outcomes with fresh and cryopreserved epididymal spermatozoa from the same couples
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2001; 16(3): 495 - 499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.