Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (49)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dumoulin, J. C.M.
Right arrow Articles by Evers, J. L.H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dumoulin, J. C.M.
Right arrow Articles by Evers, J. L.H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 14, No. 2, 465-469, February 1999
© 1999 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Effect of oxygen concentration on human in-vitro fertilization and embryo culture*

John C.M. Dumoulin1,3, Chantal J.J. Meijers1, Marijke Bras1, Edith Coonen1, Joep P.M. Geraedts2 and Johannes L.H. Evers1

1 Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and 2 Department of Molecular Cell Biology & Genetics, Academic Hospital, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands

In this prospective randomized study on 1380 consecutive in-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatments, the results were compared of culture of human oocytes and embryos for the first 2 or 3 days of development in microdroplets of medium under oil using a gas phase containing either atmospheric (~20%) or reduced (5%) O2 concentrations. No significant differences were found between the two groups cultured under either 5% or 20% O2 in rates of fertilization (60 versus 61%, respectively), embryo development at day 2 or 3, pregnancy (26.6 versus 25.4%, respectively), and implantation (13.4 versus 14.0%, respectively). Culture of surplus embryos under 5% O2 resulted in a significantly higher mean incidence of blastocyst formation per cycle as compared to the 20% O2 group (25.8 ± 2.0 versus 20.4 ± 1.9, respectively). The mean number of cells of embryos classified as blastocysts by microscopic observation of a blastocoel was significantly higher in the 5% O2 group as compared to the 20% O2 group, both in blastocysts fixed on day 5 (39.8 ± 1.7 versus 31.9 ± 1.9, respectively), as well as those fixed on day 6 (45.6 ± 2.6 versus 33.7 ± 3.4, respectively). This difference was due to the fact that significantly more blastocysts of the 20% O2 group had an abnormal low cell number of < 25 as compared to the 5% O2 group, both in blastocysts fixed on day 5 (39 versus 22%, respectively), as well as those fixed on day 6 (43 versus 22%, respectively). To conclude, although culture under 5% O2 leads to slightly improved preimplantation embryonic viability, this effect is either too marginal to result in higher pregnancy rates, or low O2 concentrations exert an effect during the later stages of preimplantation development only.

Key words: embryo culture/oxygen/preimplantation development

*Data presented in part at the 14th Annual Meeting of the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE),Göteborg, Sweden, June 21–24, 1998.

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: IVF Laboratory, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Hospital Maastricht, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Meintjes, S. J. Chantilis, J. D. Douglas, A. J. Rodriguez, A. R. Guerami, D. M. Bookout, B. D. Barnett, and J. D. Madden
A controlled randomized trial evaluating the effect of lowered incubator oxygen tension on live births in a predominantly blastocyst transfer program
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2009; 24(2): 300 - 307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R. G. Sturmey, J. A. Hawkhead, E. A. Barker, and H. J. Leese
DNA damage and metabolic activity in the preimplantation embryo
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2009; 24(1): 81 - 91.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
D.H. Betts and P. Madan
Permanent embryo arrest: molecular and cellular concepts
Mol. Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2008; 14(8): 445 - 453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
D. Feil, M. Lane, C. T. Roberts, R. L. Kelley, L. J. Edwards, J. G. Thompson, and K. L. Kind
Effect of culturing mouse embryos under different oxygen concentrations on subsequent fetal and placental development
J. Physiol., April 1, 2006; 572(1): 87 - 96.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. C.M. Dumoulin, J. G. Derhaag, M. Bras, A. P.A. Van Montfoort, A. D.M. Kester, J. L.H. Evers, J. P.M. Geraedts, and E. Coonen
Growth rate of human preimplantation embryos is sex dependent after ICSI but not after IVF
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 484 - 491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. Coonen, J. G. Derhaag, J. C.M. Dumoulin, L. C.P. van Wissen, M. Bras, M. Janssen, J. L.H. Evers, and J. P.M. Geraedts
Anaphase lagging mainly explains chromosomal mosaicism in human preimplantation embryos
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2004; 19(2): 316 - 324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sci Aging Knowl EnvironHome page
P. J. Hornsby
Mouse and Human Cells Versus Oxygen
Sci. Aging Knowl. Environ., July 30, 2003; 2003(30): pe21 - 21.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. J. Bean, T. J. Hassold, L. Judis, and P. A. Hunt
Fertilization in vitro increases non-disjunction during early cleavage divisions in a mouse model system
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2002; 17(9): 2362 - 2367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
P. Blondin, D. Bousquet, H. Twagiramungu, F. Barnes, and M.-A. Sirard
Manipulation of Follicular Development to Produce Developmentally Competent Bovine Oocytes
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2002; 66(1): 38 - 43.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
J. M. Rogers and E. S. Hunter III
Redox Redux: A Closer Look at Conceptal Low Molecular Weight Thiols
Toxicol. Sci., July 1, 2001; 62(1): 1 - 3.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Wrenzycki, D. Herrmann, L. Keskintepe, A. Martins Jr, S. Sirisathien, B. Brackett, and H. Niemann
Effects of culture system and protein supplementation on mRNA expression in pre-implantation bovine embryos
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2001; 16(5): 893 - 901.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. C.M. Dumoulin, E. Coonen, M. Bras, J.M. Bergers-Janssen, R. C.M. Ignoul-Vanvuchelen, L. C.P. van Wissen, J. P.M. Geraedts, and J. L.H. Evers
Embryo development and chromosomal anomalies after ICSI: effect of the injection procedure
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2001; 16(2): 306 - 312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
E. Coonen, E. Martini, J. C.M. Dumoulin, H. T.M. Hollanders-Crombach, C. de Die-Smulders, J. P.M. Geraedts, A. H.N. Hopman, and J. L.H. Evers
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of a reciprocal translocation t(3;11)(q27.3;q24.3) in siblings
Mol. Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2000; 6(3): 199 - 206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. C.M. Dumoulin, E. Coonen, M. Bras, L. C.P. van Wissen, R. Ignoul-Vanvuchelen, J.M. Bergers-Jansen, J. G. Derhaag, J. P.M. Geraedts, and J. L.H. Evers
Comparison of in-vitro development of embryos originating from either conventional in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2000; 15(2): 402 - 409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.