Human Reproduction, Vol. 14, No. 3, 677-682,
March 1999
© 1999 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Transfer technique and catheter choice influence the incidence of transcervical embryo expulsion and the outcome of IVF
1 Assisted Reproductive Unit, Al Amal Hospital, P.O. Box 921988, Amman, Jordan and 2 Uni. Frauenklinik, IVF – Labor, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538 Lubeck, Germany
We examined the influence of the procedures used in embryo transfer on pregnancy rates. Over a period of 15 months (Nov. 1996–Jan. 1998), 320 patients were recruited. They were randomized on an alternate basis either to a Wallace catheter or an Erlangen metal catheter. Randomization was also applied within the same groups for embryo transfer at 48 h and 72 h post-insemination. Fifty patients randomly selected from each group were subjected to speculum examination 15 min following embryo transfer, during which any fluid leaking from the cervix was examined for the presence of embryos. In five patients a transvaginal–transmyometrial transfer was performed. The pregnancy rate appeared to be slightly higher in patients who had their embryos transferred at 72 h than in those patients who had their transfers at 48 h, but this difference was not significant in either group. (The ease with which the Erlangen catheter was used compared with that of the Wallace catheter was reflected in a significantly lower incidence of uterine sounding of cervical dilatation and bleeding.) Also there was a significant increase (P = 0.0001) in the mucus attached to the tip of the Wallace catheter and the embryos trapped compared with those of the Erlangen group (P = 0.0007). The pregnancy rate per embryo transfer was apparently higher in the Erlangen group than in the Wallace group but this difference was not significant. In eight (16%) patients of the Wallace group, 1–3 embryos were found in the fluid sucked from the external os, compared with three (6%) patients in the Erlangen group, but again this difference was not significant. In 92% of patients who became pregnant, the transfer procedure was smooth and easy. Successful embryo transfer was not influenced by the time of transfer post-insemination. The choice of catheter did not affect pregnancy rate. In cases in which transcervical transfer is very difficult or impossible, transvaginal–transmyometrial transfer is a viable option. The significance of early or late expulsion of transferred embryos into the vagina needs to be addressed in larger controlled studies.
Key words: embryo transfer/implantation/time of transfer/transfer catheter
3 To whom all correspondence should be addressed
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  Z. Yao, S. Vansteelandt, J. Van der Elst, T. Coetsier, M. Dhont, and P. De Sutter The efficacy of the embryo transfer catheter in IVF and ICSI is operator-dependent: a randomized clinical trial Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2009; 24(4): 880 - 887. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. M. Abou-Setta, H. G. Al-Inany, R. T. Mansour, G. I. Serour, and M. A. Aboulghar Soft versus firm embryo transfer catheters for assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2005; 20(11): 3114 - 3121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. I. Shamonki, G. L. Schattman, S. D. Spandorfer, P. H. Chung, and Z. Rosenwaks Ultrasound-guided trial transfer may be beneficial in preparation for an IVF cycle Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2005; 20(10): 2844 - 2849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. I. Shamonki, S. D. Spandorfer, and Z. Rosenwaks Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer and the accuracy of trial embryo transfer Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2005; 20(3): 709 - 716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Prapas, Y. Prapas, Y. Panagiotidis, S. Prapa, P. Vanderzwalmen, and G. Makedos Cervical dilatation has a positive impact on the outcome of IVF in randomly assigned cases having two previous difficult embryo transfers Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2004; 19(8): 1791 - 1795. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. Eytan, D. Elad, U. Zaretsky, and A. J. Jaffa A glance into the uterus during in vitro simulation of embryo transfer Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2004; 19(3): 562 - 569. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Matorras, E. Urquijo, R. Mendoza, B. Corcostegui, A. Exposito, and F.J. Rodriguez-Escudero Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer improves pregnancy rates and increases the frequency of easy transfers Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2002; 17(7): 1762 - 1766. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H.N. Sallam, A.F. Agameya, A.F. Rahman, F. Ezzeldin, and A.N. Sallam Ultrasound measurement of the uterocervical angle before embryo transfer: a prospective controlled study Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2002; 17(7): 1767 - 1772. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A. McDonald and R. J. Norman A randomized controlled trial of a soft double lumen embryo transfer catheter versus a firm single lumen catheter: significant improvements in pregnancy rates Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2002; 17(6): 1502 - 1506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Tao, R. Tamis, K. Fink, B. Williams, T. Nelson-White, and R. Craig The neglected morula/compact stage embryo transfer Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2002; 17(6): 1513 - 1518. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R.T. Mansour and M.A. Aboulghar Optimizing the embryo transfer technique Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2002; 17(5): 1149 - 1153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|