Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hurst, B.S.
Right arrow Articles by United States Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Reproductive Surgery Study Group, t.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hurst, B.S.
Right arrow Articles by United States Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Reproductive Surgery Study Group, t.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 14, No. 4, 925-927, April 1999
© 1999 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Permanent implantation of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene is safe for pelvic surgery*

B.S. Hurst1 for the United States Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Reproductive Surgery Study Group§

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado, USA

Clinical trials have shown the expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) membrane to be a highly effective adhesion barrier in gynaecological reconstructive surgery, but the material has not gained wide acceptance because of uncertainty about long-term safety. We conducted a prospective, observational multicentre study to determine if permanent implantation of the ePTFE membrane in the pelvis caused any adverse effects. The subjects were 146 women in whom the membrane was implanted permanently during peritoneal reconstruction in 1991–1996. Postoperatively, patients were examined at regular intervals. The mean postoperative observation time was 3.5 years. No long-term complications occurred. There were 10 births by Caesarean section and 12 by vaginal delivery. All of the pregnancies before these 22 births were uneventful, including 10 in which the women had uterine implantation sites. There were two ectopic pregnancies and three spontaneous abortions. Since the primary purpose of the study was to evaluate the long-term safety of ePTFE, early second-look laparoscopy was not performed routinely. Nevertheless, 24 women had a subsequent operation. Adhesions were present at 8/21 of the membrane sites in these women, a significant decrease compared with adhesions at 17/21 sites during the initial procedure (P = 0.005). This large, multicentre study confirmed the long-term safety of the ePTFE membrane in pelvic reconstruction. Removal of the barrier is not necessary.

Key words: adhesions/expanded polytetrafluoroethylene/pelvis/reproductive surgery/surgical barriers

*Paper previously presented at the XV FIGO World Congress of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Copenhagen, Denmark, August 3-8, 1997.

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky Medical Center, 800 Rose Street, Lexington, Kentucky 40536, USA

§ J.Crain, Women's Specialty Center, Charlotte, NC; D.Curole, Ochsner Clinic, New Orleans, LA; G.Hill, Nashville Fertility Center, Nashville, TN; D.A.Metzger, Reproductive Medical Institute of Connecticut, Hartford, CT; A.A.Murphy, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; M.Perloe, Atlanta Reproductive Health Center, Atlanta, GA; H.Reich, Wyoming Valley Health Care System, Wilkes-Barre, PA; G.Rowe, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; J.S.Sanfilippo, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY; W.D.Schlaff, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado, Denver, CO; S.Taylor, The Fertility Institute, New Orleans, LA; and R.Wing, Women's Specialty Center, Charlotte, NC, USA.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.