Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lashen, H.
Right arrow Articles by Kennefik, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lashen, H.
Right arrow Articles by Kennefik, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 14, No. 8, 1983-1988, August 1999
© 1999 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Early resort to ovarian stimulation improves the cost-effectiveness of a donor insemination programme

H. Lashen1, M. Afnan and A. Kennefik

Assisted Conception Unit, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TG, UK

Women undergoing donor insemination (DI) are usually regularly ovulating, therefore the role of ovulation induction in this modality of treatment has been controversial. Some recent studies reported higher pregnancy rates in stimulated cycles in comparison with natural cycles. We employed a sequential step-up protocol in which treatment was started in a natural cycle, continued with a clomiphene citrate-stimulated cycle, and finished with an ovulation induction cycle. The patients were allowed three attempts at each step before moving to the next if conception did not occur. The aim of this protocol was to enhance the cost-effectiveness of the DI programme by increasing the cycle fecundability. A total of 101 patients underwent 216 cycles of DI, including 44 patients in 80 natural cycles, 38 patients in 89 CC-stimulated cycles, and 19 patients in 47 ovulation induction cycles. The clinical pregnancy rate per started cycle (CPR/C) and per patient during this period was 14% and 30% respectively. The pregnancy rates per started cycle and per patient in the natural, CC-stimulated and ovulation induction cycles were: 13 and 32%, 10 and 18%, and 21 and 53% respectively. There was no significant difference in the CPR/C in the three groups; however, the CPR per patient in the induced ovulation cycles was significantly higher than in the CC-stimulated cycles (P = 0.005). Only one patient during this period had a multiple pregnancy in the ovulation induction group, giving an overall multiple pregnancy of 3%. By using this treatment strategy, we achieved a high clinical pregnancy rate, a low multiple pregnancy rate and a low cost of treatment per pregnancy.

Key words: donor insemination/ovulation induction

1 To whom correspondence may be addressed at: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Solihull Hospital, Lode Lane, Solihull, West Midlands B91 2JL, UK


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. F. Khattab, F. A. Mustafa, and P. J. Taylor
The use of urine LH detection kits to time intrauterine insemination with donor sperm
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2005; 20(9): 2542 - 2545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
I. Ferrara, R. Balet, and J.G. Grudzinskas
Intrauterine insemination with frozen donor sperm. Pregnancy outcome in relation to age and ovarian stimulation regime
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2002; 17(9): 2320 - 2324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.