Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bonduelle, M.
Right arrow Articles by Van Steirteghem, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bonduelle, M.
Right arrow Articles by Van Steirteghem, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 14, No. suppl_1, pp. 243-264, 1999
© 1999 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Seven years of intracytoplasmic sperm injection and follow-up of 1987 subsequent children

Maryse Bonduelle1, Michel Camus2, Anick De Vos2, Catherine Staessen2, Herman Tournaye2, Elvire Van Assche1, Greta Verheyen2, Paul Devroey2, Inge Liebaers1 and André Van Steirteghem2,3

1 Centre for Medical Genetics, Dutch-speaking Brussels Free University (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) Belgium 2 Centre for Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital and Medical School, Dutch-speaking Brussels Free University (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) Belgium

Correspondence: 3To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Academisch Ziekenhuis VUB, Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with ejaculated, epididymal or testicular spermatozoa was first successful in 1992 and has since become the widely accepted treatment for couples with severe male-factor infertility. The outcome of several thousands of ICSI cycles in terms of fertilization, embryo cleavage and implantation is similar to that for conventional in-vitro fertilization in couples with tubal or idiopathic infertility. To evaluate the important issue of safety of the new technique of ICSI, a prospective follow-up study of 1987 children born after ICSI was carried out. The aim was to compile data on karyotypes, congenital malformations, growth parameters and developmental milestones. Parents' agreement to genetic counselling was obtained as well as prenatal diagnosis, followed by a physical examination of the children at 2 months, 1 year and 2 years. Between April 1991 and August 1997, 1699, 91 and 118 children were born after ICSI with ejaculated, epididymal and testicular spermatozoa respectively; 79 children were born from cryopreserved ICSI embryos. In all, 1082 karyotypes were determined by prenatal diagnosis, 18 of which were abnormal and de novo (1.66%) (nine each of autosomal and sex chromosomal aberrations), and 10 karyotypes (0.92%) were inherited structural aberrations. Of these, nine (eight balanced structural aberrations and one unbalanced trisomy 21) were transmitted from the father. Ten pregnancies were terminated after prenatal karyotyping or DNA testing. Forty-six major malformations (2.3%) were observed at birth. Seven malformations, observed by prenatal ultrasound, were terminated. Twenty-one (1.1 %) stillbirths, including four with major malformations, occurred later than 20 weeks of pregnancy. Mean gestational age at birth was 38.7 weeks for singletons, 36.0 weeks for twins and 32.0 weeks for triplets. No specifically higher incidence of malformations was found in any given subgroup.

Key words: congenital malformations/fetal karyotypes/genetic counselling/ICSI/male infertility


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Bowdin, C. Allen, G. Kirby, L. Brueton, M. Afnan, C. Barratt, J. Kirkman-Brown, R. Harrison, E. R Maher, and W. Reardon
A survey of assisted reproductive technology births and imprinting disorders
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2007; 22(12): 3237 - 3240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Oehninger and R. G. Gosden
Should ICSI be the treatment of choice for all cases of in-vitro conception?: No, not in light of the scientific data
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2002; 17(9): 2237 - 2242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Sousa, N. Cremades, J. Silva, C. Oliveira, L. Ferraz, J.T. da Silva, P. Viana, and A. Barros
Predictive value of testicular histology in secretory azoospermic subgroups and clinical outcome after microinjection of fresh and frozen-thawed sperm and spermatids
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2002; 17(7): 1800 - 1810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.